BTW them desperate folks at Shi .. chat are boasting my videos (alhamdulillah it already's approaching the 10k mark). Some of their more sensible members know very well that the rise of Sunnism (in the population of native Sunnis AND Ex-Shias) is not myth but a fact, bitterly admitted even by the Iranian regime and some of their hysterical Maraji' in Qom who still can't believe their eyes and ears when they realise how the vast majority of Ahwazi Arabs (previously 101% Shia just like southern Iraqis) for example have turned their backs to the cloest Majoosi and pagan cult of Imamism and accepted Islam/Sunnah:
http://forum.twelvershia.net/ex-shias/the-rise-of-the-sunnais-ex-shias-(video)/
He doesn't really say anything that hasn't been heard before. You would expect an ex-Shia 'researcher' to at least come up with some arguments that don't sound identical to standard Sunni ones.
What does he want me to say, invent the wheel again? Also, I was told to speak very general and some brothers even complaint saying that it is too technical for the average Muslim who doesn't know all these shubuhat! I'd love to meet Haydar Hussayn in person (in London) and have a, let's call it civil discussion with him. But I have a feeling he knows I am not the average dumb Sunni the fake Peshawar nights type (that he mocks himself, knowing that the book is a fake).
Somebody basically asks for help (explenation) having been obviously influenced by my video, Haydar Hussayn tries it utmost (control damage) to explain the kufri beliefs of the Rafidah:
I don't know any Shia who says that the knowledge of the Imams is identical to Allah's knowledge. Yes, many have exaggerate beliefs about their knowledge, and there are also narrations that reflect that stream of thought within Shi'ism, but still nobody says it reaches Allah's knowledge.
You see, this is where most Shias are not honest with themselves, they think they can save themselves and their religion with semantics. Well, of course no Shia says that Allah = Imams or Imam's knowledge = Allah's knowledge, this is not how Shayatin work. The Rafidah scholars from Kulaini to Khomeini and other modern day authorities (Maraji') have DESCRIBED the knowledge of the Imams EXACTLY as Allah's knowledge is described in the Qur'an. I've made a clip about that, even someone more moderate (Ayat. Haydari) has written an entire book about these kufri descriptions of the knowledge of the Imams, affirming that they EVERY drop in the OCEAN every leaf that falls from a tree:
So Shias can do damage control as much as they like, they can say that they PERSONALLY do not believe in these mainstream kufriyat, however, they shouldn't accuse their opponents (including their main boogyman the so called Wahhabis) with lies and distortions! They should rather hold their evil Maraji' to accunt and that Zindiq Kulaini, Majlisi and co. who propagated these beliefs in the first place.
He then goes on saying:
Also, there are many narrations that clearly say that the Imams don't have knowledge of the unseen, and instead that their knowledge is inherited from the Prophet (s).
Well, there are also many narrations stating that taking oaths by other than Allah is shirk/kufr, that invocation is the essence of 'Ibada, that Imams forget and make mistakes and many other pro-Tawhidi/Sunni narrations, but these are all detested by Shia scholarship, 99% of Shia Ayatullats don't even mention this stuff, all they are concerned with is khums and spreading khurafat in the name of Ahlul Bayt. The more heretical the narration the more acceptable, this is unfortunately the reality.
Aya tathir:
He objects with my analysis saying:
... What it does show however is that this section of the verse (which he objects to allegedly being taken out of context) was applied to those we say it was applied to (also keep in mind that the same people were taken for Mubahila, not all his wives, cousins, and nephews. Secondly, it also establishes that the view of the wives of the Prophet were not part of the Ahlulbayt in the special sense we mean it is not something that is unique to us, and was clearly one held by at least some companions.
Some companions are no evidence to nobody, the Prophet in SAHIH narrations address 'AISHA as Ahlul Bayt and EVERY other single wife, there is no special and non-special Ahlul Bayt acc. to the Qur'an and Sunnah and Arabic language. The Arabic language, Qur'an and the Sunnah PROVE that the wives are 100% Ahlul Bayt, there is no doubt about that, the Qur'an explains the Qur'an, there is too many evidences to cite but I leave the readers with a very good analysis:
https://youpuncturedtheark.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/hadeeth-kisa-cloak-explained-by-an-ex-shia-scholar/And of course do Shias cut that verse in half, only reciting the last bit, because the whole verse itself destroys their claim. Shias have no evidence that this verse is restricted to 5 individuals only, what makes it worse is that they include yet another 6 individuals to that verse! It's as we say in Arabic:
ما بني على الباطل فهو باطل
(that which is built upon falsehood IS falsehood)
and in the end of the day it is exactly as I stated and also Shaykh Hussein al-Mu'ayyad (Iraqi Ex-Shia scholars) repeatedly says:
The religion of the Rafidah is based upon MUTASHABIHAT (ambigious) verses (and even hadith like Ghadir), like all wrong religions, the best verses they cite are Mutashabih and do not constitute any Hujjah let alone clear cut proof for the divine Imamite of 12 individuals.
The rest of the thread are comments by butt-hurt Rafidis who obviously didn't watch the interview. One comes with the common excuse that I am properly not a real Iranian or not from a religious family. Both false claims have been debunked by me in the very interview! Another one says that I was mumbling and didn't finish the topics. Well, here I agree, the interview was not proper planned, I spoke from my heart and did not intend to even refute Rafidi Shubuhat, I thought it will be questions about my life only, but when the brother asked so many different questions I tried to answer them in a SIMPLE way and quickly. Don't worry, In sha Allah more videos to come where I shall Inshaallah prove that Rafidism is based on Mutashabihat, no clear hujjah, completely ambigious and filled with Zandaqah.
4 Replies
4175 Views
July 26, 2017, 06:22:55 PM
