At your majaalis, they say "every day is Ashura and every land is Karbala" as if it is a victory slogan. The reality is that your faces have been darkened, therefore, the appropriate slogan - to highlight your reality - is "every day is Saqeefa and every lun is up Rafidha".
If Iran does it or expresses desire to do so, it is "international cooperation" but if Saudi Arabia cooperates with the international community, they are traitors and enemies of Islam.
Then why do you question Saudi Arabia? Why don't you accept the possibility that Sheikh Nimr Baqir al-Nimr was a threat to Saudi Arabia's internal stability?
Remember Abdolmalek Rigi of Jundullah? I remember the days when PressTV announced his capture and later execution. Not a single Sunni person I know condemned Iran for executing someone who wished to undermine Iran's internal stability.
Why is it that every Shi'i executed in Saudi Arabia is necessarily a cherub whereas every Sunni executed in Iran is a criminal or terrorist, according to you?
I did by showing you how Iran supported each invasion and were later beneficiaries of what transpired in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
There is another lie! I don't expect you to ever speak the truth but to revive whatever integrity may be left in you, compare the situation in Iraq before and after Saddam and then tell me how he (Saddam) posed a threat to the world.
The fact that you speak lie after lie to defend Iran is exactly why Saudi Arabia is weary of its Shia population. You are a Pakistani and I have never heard you defend Pakistan but you will bend over backwards to defend Iran.
We were talking about the Second Gulf War.
However, since you have alluded to it, please find the New York Times article dated January 31, 1991: WAR IN THE GULF: IRAN; IRAN SAID TO PLAY BOTH SIDES IN GULF
Yeah, the Saudis have unleashed many luns upon you. The discomfort in your tone and the resentment (for the Saudis) in your posts prove it.
Quite easy for a coward like you to say "just testing you" after caught making a blunder! Not surprised at all. Nonetheless, as all your cop-outs, it was very weak. Try harder next time. Or even better, try reading more carefully.
Oh, so you are not writing off the possibility that the Iranians listen to you? To have you as an adviser, I must say I overestimated the Iranians and their level of intelligence.
Much like tere ko lun laga hai "the hard way", that is not the answer to my question so I will state it again: If Iran considers the possibility of becoming allies with the US, and by extension staying out of Israel's way - much like what Saudi Arabia is doing - would you agree that they are no better than the Saudis?
Once again, thank you. Your cowardice to not even verbally accept it shows that you do not even stand by your own words.
The scared one hiding in the cave!
Really? You never made that claim?
Here are your own words: "You haven't been to any Shia mosque. Just a tactic played by you".
"At your majaalis, they say "every day is Ashura and every land is Karbala" as if it is a victory slogan"
What they say at your Majalis? So it's my Majalis, and you seem to know what's mine better than me. Wow.
"The reality is that your faces have been darkened"
Who's faces have been darkened, history clearly tells that. And it's been darkened by their own actions. We mention history and you jump to their defence with ifs and buts and counter arguments or what ever excuse you can find. Chand logo ko bachaneh ke liyeh sachai aur haqeeqath meh hera peri peh uthar ai ho.
"therefore, the appropriate slogan - to highlight your reality - is "every day is Saqeefa and every lun is up Rafidha"
What is this lun that you keep repeating? Please do tell me. Where do keep getting it from.
"If Iran does it or expresses desire to do so, it is "international cooperation" but if Saudi Arabia cooperates with the international community, they are traitors and enemies of Islam"
Saudi Arabia is funding the Sunni extreme belief along with Sunni militants and militias. That's the problem.
"Then why do you question Saudi Arabia? Why don't you accept the possibility that Sheikh Nimr Baqir al-Nimr was a threat to Saudi Arabia's internal stability?"
What threat was he? They could have exiled him if that was the case. Was Jamal kashoggi a threat too? He wasn't a Shia, was he? Usman the third Caliph saw many threats, did he order the execution of anyone? What about Umar or Abu Bakr? Did they order any executions on such grounds? Where's Seerath e Shaykhain or Khulafaa e Rashedoon? Or do you go by as it suits you.
"Remember Abdolmalek Rigi of Jundullah? I remember the days when PressTV announced his capture and later execution. Not a single Sunni person I know condemned Iran for executing someone who wished to undermine Iran's internal stability"
No I don't. Please do enlighten me. Try to get a grip on yourself and engage in a healthy and suitable conversation and discussion.
"Why is it that every Shi'i executed in Saudi Arabia is necessarily a cherub whereas every Sunni executed in Iran is a criminal or terrorist, according to you?"
When and where did I say that?
"I did by showing you how Iran supported each invasion and were later beneficiaries of what transpired in both Afghanistan and Iraq"
To cooperate against a common enemy and a global threat is necessary for the international community. And I've always and always criticised Iran even when I was there that it should do more to be part of the international community and quit the slogan 'death to America, death to Russia, death to Israel and death to this and that'. You have responsibility and commitment both to your country and people as well as your neighbours and being a regional and international partner.
And since the revolution Iran has been treated and looked at differently and separately. It's been both ways. It's less Iran's fault and much more the other way. You can't sideline and isolate a country or a regime. And the end of the day it's the people who are going to get effected and hurt. It doesn't matter whether it's Iran, Saudi Arabia or who ever. You believe that this is a Shia regime and it should go. I don't believe in that. Be it a Sunni regime like there have been, Saddam or Qaddafi, what did regime change bring? Disaster and chaos. No matter who brings the regime change and who brings the disaster. That's my opinion.
"There is another lie! I don't expect you to ever speak the truth but to revive whatever integrity may be left in you, compare the situation in Iraq before and after Saddam and then tell me how he (Saddam) posed a threat to the world"
"how he (Saddam) posed a threat to the world"
He attacked Iran in September 22nd 1980. He invaded Kuwait and ruined it. The Saudis saw him as an absolute threat to their country and Kingdom and begged the Americans for help. He killed people in his own country be it Sunnis or Shias or Kurds. He executed his political rivals. It is said he even killed his own family members, his blood relatives who he saw as a threat. Would you like a list. Even still I was against the regime change in Iraq. It's not the regime change, it's how they went about it.
"The fact that you speak lie after lie to defend Iran is exactly why Saudi Arabia is weary of its Shia population. You are a Pakistani and I have never heard you defend Pakistan but you will bend over backwards to defend Iran"
I'm not against Saudi Arabia nor in defence of Iran blindly. As for Pakistan is concerned, where have you started a thread on attacking Pakistan? You criticise and condemn Iran. Why Iran only. Start a thread and criticise those countries and regimes that need to be criticised including Iran. You get my point. That's the problem.
"However, since you have alluded to it, please find the New York Times article dated January 31, 1991: WAR IN THE GULF: IRAN; IRAN SAID TO PLAY BOTH SIDES IN GULF"
We need to look into the news regardless of who the news is about. It's not necessary that everything we hear and read is 100% true.
"Here are your own words: "
You haven't been to any Shia mosque. Just a tactic played by you".
The tales and stories you tell don't add up nor make any sense. You're not a Shia but probably have been to Shia mosques and I am a Shia and part of that community. So who am I going to believe. You or myself about my mosques, community and people. And lets say you experienced this, am I suppose to visit a few Sunni mosques and Imams in a few small towns or villages and paint a picture of the entire Sunni community and faith at large on that experience. Wake up man. Forget about the lun what ever that may be and come off it.