Salavat with V, pronounce it with a Persian V like your Majoosi scholars from Qom otherwise you will sound like a Muslim, Sunni.
Anyway, brother Farid, I've got a question, the Rafidah make a blunt claim (of course by providing no evidence), they claim that their narrations about Abdallah being the last king of Arabia are actually Sunni narrations, omitted by the Saudi regime. I mean even if they were Sunni narrations, then it still doesn't prove their religion, their Mahdi is the dajjal, no doubt and the narrations are inconsistent anyway, still give me your input, I quote from these Zanadiqah:
From one of the Ahmad Al-Hassan sect followers:
عن رسول الله (ص):
(يحكم الحجاز رجل اسمه اسم حيوان ، إذا رأيته حسبت في عينه الحول من البعيد ، وإذا اقتربت منه لاترى في عينه شيئاً ، يخلفه أخ له اسمه عبدالله. ويل لشيعتنا منه ، أعادها ثلاثاً ؛ بشروني بموته أبشركم بظهور الحجة )
مئتان وخمسون علامة: 122
From Rasulollah (pbuhaf):
Hijaz (Saudi Arabia) will be ruled by a man whose name is the name of an animal, when you see him from a distance, you would think he has a lazy eye, and if you get close to him, you do not see anything (wrong) in his eyes. He will be succeeded by a brother of his, named Abdullah. Woe to our Shia (followers) from him! Woe to our Shia (followers) from him! Woe to our Shia (followers) from him! - he repeated it three times - Give me the good news of his death, and I shall give you the good news of the appearance of the hujjah (Imam Mahdi).
Reference: Two Hundred and Fifty Signs, sign number 122
Give me the good news of his death, and I shall give you the good news of the appearance of the hujjah (Imam Mahdi).
His death is GOOD NEWS!
King Abdullah's death = Appearance of Imam Mahdi (in a very short amount of time).
-
This is a Sunni narration. The author of the book copied it from Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal - but now it cannot be found in Musnad Ahmad.
Some have argued that since the author of the 250 Signs book is a very reliable scholar, then the hadith must have been dropped from the new prints of Musnad Ahmad due to influence from the Saudis.
Others say the hadith does not exist - so it's false.
This can be checked if someone has a very very old copy of Musnad Ahmad - perhaps an ancient copy in a library.
Some have argued that since it was written before these kings existed, then the hadith MUST be authentic because it has spoken of future events which seem to have come true.