The book Ek Ghalati Ka Izala is available online for anyone to read. Why don't you quote from the original book where this passage is written? And if you don't understand Urdu the English translation is available too
https://www.alislam.org/library/browse/volume/Ruhani_Khazain/book/Aik_Ghalati_Ka_Azala/?l=English#page/-9/mode/1up
Keep in mind this is a small booklet of not more than two dozen pages. Don't be lazy, read the book and then tell me where this fabricated quote is from.
As far as textual integrity is concerned, I can expect nothing from a group known for intellectual dishonesty of the highest order. If you can try to change the word of Allah (swt), how hard is it to modify your own books? What your booklet says online versus what I have quoted shall be reconciled in due time when I get to the video.
Old and useless objection that has been debunked so many times
Again, thank you for bringing this up because in due time - next point specifically - I will prove that your false, "Pirate of the Caribbean" prophet was known for changing his mind sooner than you change your clothes.
Where in this entire video was it quoted that Ghulam Ahmad said whoever believes Jesus is deceased will burn in hell? I ask you to prove something but you bring something else. Brazen deception and very pathetic of you.
Going through a debate exceeding 12 clips, I shared the wrong link. My apologies to everyone, including you. Here is the actual link. If you can expect me to read a booklet, I expect you to watch the preceeding and proceeding videos (in case you miss the point).
In case you missed the point - and truth usually evades Qadianis even if it hits them between their eyes - allow me to highlight the main points.
1. In Baraaheen-e-Ahmadia, Mirza aligned himself with the Islamic position (that Jesus (asws) is alive) and it is said that he wrote that book with "Divine Revelation from Allah (swt)". I think we can both agree that going against such a belief - against something Divinely Revealed - is tantamount to kufr and worthy of punishment of Hellfire in the Hereafter. Keep reading; this will be reaffirmed in point # 3.
2. Then, despite the matter being "Divinely Revealed" to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, he changed his position on this matter (please refer to the video and the helpless and laughable rebuttal by your brothers). And this should prove to everyone your entire cult's dishonest ways. So is it any wonder that what I have quoted for you from your texts are missing today or has something to the contrary in another book authored by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad? The man could not even stick to one position for more than a day.
3. He maintained the position that Jesus (asws) was alive for 52 years of his life. Then suddenly, Mirza claimed that Allah (swt) had "revealed" to him new information that Jesus (asws) had died and everyone who does not believe it (that Jesus (asws) has died) is a mushrik (refer to the video please). Since you claim to know logic, if disbelieving in the death of Jesus (asws) makes one mushrik, logic necessitates that prior to the "revelation of this new information" to Mirza, those who disbelieved in Jesus (asws) being alive were bound to Hellfire according to Muslims and Mirza (who held that belief for 52 years of his life before changing it).
Look how you are running like a chicken without a head. I ask you to prove about the Shahada and you dodge the question to say Ghulam Ahmad suffered a humiliating death. How did he suffer a humiliating death? You haven't proven that either. All you keep proving is how stupid and weak you are.
Dying while taking a dump with your life leaving through your rear-end is quite an honor, right?
Are you that stupid to think that every single part of India was having an epidemic cholera simultaneously from 1899 to 1923? Are you ever stupider to say that the cholera pandemic that reached Russia, Middle East, and Eastern Europe engulfed those places in their entirety as well? Surely you must be.
The burden of proof is upon you to prove that Lahore was spared from this pandemic since your original claim - that there was no cholera outbreak in Lahore - has been challenged and refuted. You had the audacity to refer to me as a "chicken without a head" but watch how I will slice yours.
Lahore, if you know the history of the subcontinent, was the capital of Punjab. I have two sources that say, "According to Leonard Rogers, following an outbreak of cholera at the Haridwar Kumbh Mela,
the epidemic spread to Europe via Punjab, Afghanistan, Persia, and southern Russia."
Sources: 1. R. Dasgupta. "Time Trends of Cholera in India : An Overview" (PDF). INFLIBNET. Retrieved 13 December 2015.
2. Rogers, L. (1926). The Conditions Influencing the Incidence and Spread of Cholera in India. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 19(Sect Epidemiol State Med), 59–93.
Classic deflection. You keep exposing how you have absolutely nothing but ad hominems.
I can give you an ad hominem which will make the remains of the filthy body of your one-eyed Dajjal quake in his grave but I will save it for a later time.
You just proved that a Prophet can come as long as he isn't a law-bearing prophet and is a Muslim upholding Islam. Well done.
Wow, dimwit, again falling for absence of evidence being evidence of absence. I clearly said that Jesus (asws) will come as a Muslim to uphold Islam. It isn't your fault; your lot are trained to read your own desires into texts and insert them into others' words.
Wow what an idiot you are. Chichawatni is the headquarters of your anti-Ahmadi group called Majlis-e-Ahrar. Thanks for calling it a toilet though.
Either ways, with all due respect to those who live in Chichawatni, it must be a "toilet" metaphorically because it is the center for the demise of Qadianis, just like another toilet served as the death place of your one-eyed Dajjal.
95 Replies
6343 Views