You have not understood the issues properly. Thats why you are upon a deviant path.
Main source of Sunnah is Prophet(saws). You claim to get it through Ahlulbayt who neither saw Prophet(saws) nor where born after his time. We got it from people who saw Prophet(saws) and lived their lives with him.
The point which should make you realize the problem is comparing the Sunnah reported via Ahlulbayt in Sunni books, compared to your books. You will find it in conflicting. And ironically you claim your Imams were under taqiyyah during their lives, which technically makes their reports unreliable, unless supported by a source which was from a time without Taqiyyah.
Hmmm, so Prophet --> Ali Al-Murtaza --> Hasan Al-Mujtaba --> Hussain As-Shaheed.... are not direct from the Prophet???
If you read the chains of most of your hadeeth then the chains are like. ....Zurarah- Baqir - Prophet.
Or ...Zurarah- Jafar - Prophet.
etc.
They were born decades after Prophet(saws).
I get your point however what I dont get is your blind trust in the sahaba, their actions and then the narrations of erroneous narrators.
We put our trust in Allah who praised Sahaba in Quran. Infact Your Imam himself put the trust in Sahaba, regarding the authentic hadeeth of al-Kafi. The problem is your ignorance.
And why are you hiding away from the main problem i raised, which is that the reports from Ahlulbayt in Sunni books conflict with reports from Ahlulbayt in Shia books. So the problem is not in Sahaba. The problem lies in the narrators.
I repeat:
you claim your Imams were under taqiyyah during their lives, which technically makes their reports unreliable, unless supported by a source which was from a time without Taqiyyah.