Breaking the law and resisting arrest can be dealt with by force. This is the law even here in the US and other first world countries. This was the law in Abu Bakr's government and as leader he has the full authority to enforce laws by force. Qur'an says to obey those in authority.
At last, finally a mature response without sarcasm, insult and being funny and playful. At least we're getting somewhere.
"Breaking the law and resisting arrest can be dealt with by force"
Ok, which law and whos law? The decision Abu Bakr made and the action that Khalid carried out was that based on Shariah law or law of the government?
"This was the law in Abu Bakr's government and as leader he has the full authority to enforce laws by force. Qur'an says to obey those in authority"
Ok then what about the 6th Caliph of the Muslims, Yazeed Ibne Muawiyah and his governor Ubaidullah Ibne Ziyaad? Where does their governmental law and rights go as a Caliph and his acting governor and commander according to your philosophy?
The majority of tabe'een and Sahaba, scholars and noble people accepted and gave allegiance to Yazeed, was his use of force against those who resisted justified and lawful?
You said about Abu Bakr,
"and as leader he has the full authority to enforce laws by force"
What about Yazeed? Does the same apply to him? If not then why?
You said, "Qur'an says to obey those in authority" this is exactly what the armed convoy under the command of Ubaidullah Ibne Ziyaad did and believed in.
I would definitely like an intellectual and constructive response. Lets see if I get one this time.