If the Imam (ra) did not give his own statement based on his own opinion then it is incumbent upon you to accept his word as is and acknowledge that indeed "Allah has declared".
Okay, so you are doubting the Imam (ra), hence, say it openly that he lied upon the Qur'an.
By the way, to help you out a bit (only to expose your ignorance), Allah (swt) also declares via qudsi hadith!
Your scholars have graded it as authentic. So the point remains: the Imam (ra) must have lied, naudhubillah!
....said no one ever, except you! I would take your scholars critique of a hadith over your opinion and hypothetical points.
...because these narrations are classed authentic.
You have a case against Imam Jafar As-Sadiq (ra) or his companions or your scholars. You lose one, at least, but it casts a huge doubt over your madhhab.
"If the Imam (ra) did not give his own statement based on his own opinion then it is incumbent upon you to accept his word as is and acknowledge that indeed "Allah has declared"
If that's the case and that's how you want to put it then why can't we accept everything they say? Or everything that's attributed them? I will give you an example of this. There are a lot of things which are attributed to our Imams and you challenge them with the Qur'an. I'll jog your memory in a minute. You can't and shouldn't pick and choose what suits you and when it suits you.
"Okay, so you are doubting the Imam (ra), hence, say it openly that he lied upon the Qur'an"
No the Imam didn't lie. There is a misunderstanding somewhere along the line by the narrators. When you narrate something and it goes through different channels there's bound to be a difference. Also what's been said depends on those who are listening how much and well they've understood.
"By the way, to help you out a bit (only to expose your ignorance), Allah (swt) also declares via qudsi hadith"
This is interesting. So we've seen and learned something new here people that Allah also declares through hadiths and narrations rather than bothering through the Qur'an. So does this mean that it's not necessary that everything is or has to be in the Qur'an.
"Your scholars have graded it as authentic. So the point remains: the Imam (ra) must have lied, naudhubillah!"
Once again, no the Imam didn't lie there are plenty of other reasons which I've mentioned. I don't know why you're jumping up and down with this one.
"said no one ever, except you! I would take your scholars critique of a hadith over your opinion and hypothetical points"
That's fine, you can take what ever and whom ever you want. But you need to convince others who do not take it at face or word value. What are you going to do or how are you going to convince those who want clear evidence in black and white that ALLAH DECLARED IT?
Are you going to say "yes Allah did declare it but didn't bother to mention it in the Qur'an. I've taken it at face value without looking into it and so should you".
"because these narrations are classed authentic"
Ok, so what's the evidence of their authenticity? Or do we start taking things at face value based on what suits us?