Complain against Ibn Taymiyya(r)

[Muhammad Tazin]

As Salamu Alaikum,
As Ibn Taymiya(r) made very detailed analysis of Sabaiite-Shia religion. Shia_S decided to attack his personal image using the name of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah.  So that they can make his works null in the eye of Ahle Sunnah mass people.
here is the link,which is being translated in several languages in Pro-Shia sites-
http://www.shiapen.com/comprehensive/ibn-taimiyah/in-the-eyes-of-sunni-ulema.html

As a follower of Hanafi fiqh and being well-communicated with brothers of Deobandi-Madrasat, I just can assure without even checking books  that- These are lies about Hanafi scholars! because Ibn-Taymiyya(r) , Ibnul Qayyim(r) are highly respected in the Madrasat/Islamic Schools run by Ulama of Deoband !! IF Hanafi or any other scholars of Fiqh,Aqaed would have written such thing against Ibn Taymiyya(r), then our scholars could not be such praising about them!!!!

I want our senior members to refute this article of Shia-Pen.

[Furkan]

Some scholars refuted him, made takfeer on him or praisedd him. Ikthilaaf Brother.

[sword_of_sunnah]

Use the search engines, because most of the arguments against him has already been refuted on various websites and forums.

[MuslimK]

Walaikum Salam,

Yes, brother. There were scholars who opposed and criticised Ibn Taimiyah. 

lol Habib Ali Jefri is also in the list of scholars who opposed Ibn Taimiyah.

[Moin]

I once started to refute that article on HCY forum. But then I skipped it. It appears that the topic is no more available there and most probably it got deleted when the forum was down for sometime. I made several attempts to defend him against Shi'ites, Ash'arites and all those who opposed him unjustly. This is one of those attempts:
http://forums.islamicawakening.com/threads/in-defense-of-imam-ibn-taymiyyah-rahimahullah.31669/

A lot can be added to what has already posted there as it was done few years back. However, I feel if one wants to understand him then he need to learn Arabic as most of issues concerning him are related to some of the difficult issues.

[Furkan]

Arabic is defintely the key.

[Muhammad Tazin]

I once started to refute that article on HCY forum. But then I skipped it. It appears that the topic is no more available there and most probably it got deleted when the forum was down for sometime. I made several attempts to defend him against Shi'ites, Ash'arites and all those who opposed him unjustly. This is one of those attempts:
http://forums.islamicawakening.com/threads/in-defense-of-imam-ibn-taymiyyah-rahimahullah.31669/

A lot can be added to what has already posted there as it was done few years back. However, I feel if one wants to understand him then he need to learn Arabic as most of issues concerning him are related to some of the difficult issues.

Thanx brother, I think this link you gave going to help me a lot. And I will also try to acquire more info from search engine
And other brothers.... yes your are right,there were Ikhtilaf. But I can't help thinking that any Well-Known Ulama made Takfir on him- as scholars of Madhhab and Salafi_S highly respects him.
May be possible for So_called_Hanafi(Barelvi,neo-sufi) nad people like Habib al Jifri of Modern era can do this.