`Iraq was great before the Shia government

[Hani]

al-Salamu `Aleykum,


I don't think any human being with intellect today still believes that `Iraq under the military Iranian Shia regime is better than the old `Iraq under the secular military regime.


`Iraqi soldiers posing with Yasir al-Habib's book "al-Faahishah" which accuses `A'ishah (as) of adultery and whatnot...

[Rationalist]

The same is with Iran. It was better under secular rule. For some reason a religious state no longer meets the standard of the Sunnah. Instead a religious state takes revenge on anyone questioning it.

[MuslimK]

The other day special advisor to Iran's president said that Iraq is the capital of Iran

[Hani]

They keep saying stuff like this which shows their true intentions, they want to dominate the region, they said before that Bahrayn was a part of Iran, and they said they were behind Yemen and they claimed Syria is their own battle ground and an extension of their country.

May Allah save us from the Zanadiqah.

[Hadrami]

there should be a new motto
"Iran In, Your Country Be Ruined"

[Hadrami]

They keep saying stuff like this which shows their true intentions, they want to dominate the region, they said before that Bahrayn was a part of Iran, and they said they were behind Yemen and they claimed Syria is their own battle ground and an extension of their country.

May Allah save us from the Zanadiqah.

Just like their cousin dreaming of Eretz Israel which cover many current arab countries

[Taha]

^ The difference is that the vast vast majority of Israelis (including the right-wing Likudniks) don't want to expand. Iranians do

[Hadrami]

^ The difference is that the vast vast majority of Israelis (including the right-wing Likudniks) don't want to expand. Iranians do

from shia iranians living here that i know of, all dont care what their elite clergies think. They dislike what they are doing to Iran. Maybe im with the wrong crowd of iranian

[Husayn]

I'm currently doing some research, and plan on writing an article or maybe a small book regarding the history of Iranian Rafidi attacks against the Ummah - will probablly start with Shah Ismail the Safavid and go from there.

There is no doubt that Iranian Rafidism has been a sword aimed at the back of the Muslim Ummah for hundreds of years.

[Rationalist]

^ The difference is that the vast vast majority of Israelis (including the right-wing Likudniks) don't want to expand. Iranians do

There is a plan to make Israel into a greater Israel for their Messiah to come, likewise is the case with the Iranian revolution to expand for the 12th Imam.

[Rationalist]

There is no doubt that Iranian Rafidism has been a sword aimed at the back of the Muslim Ummah for hundreds of years.

I'm sure you are aware that there are lot of Iraqi Shias who don't want the Iranian to control them.

[Hani]

^ Yes but those `Iraqi Shia don't have a voice, the ones with the voice and political backing from inside and outside `Iraq are the Rafidi fanatics in control.

You think we don't have moderate Shia here in Lebanon who disagree with Iran? But look at what happens to them when they decide to protest in front of the Iranian embassy. (They shot that anti-Iranian Shia and killed him)








Guess who are the filthy scum wearing black shirts and jeans following the poor guy.

[Furkan]

Hadrami, here a little modification to your motto:

" Iran-in, your country in ru-in"

[Ameen]

Any country where Shia are not in government and are the opposition, that country is healthy and stable because Shias will not use means of violence and threatening behaviour to have their demands met and use what ever means necessary to overthrow or make the government unsuccessful. But as soon as Shias come in to authority and power the Sunni opposition will turn towards bloodshed, mayhem and murder and will not rest. They don't give a damn. This is the true story and picture. Reality and facts are clear throughout history to prove this. But my dear brothers always like to twist and turn things around and do their best to make Shias look bad as much as they can.

[Furkan]

Ameen, can you explain what happened when safawids came into rule? ( a hint: majority of population was sunni in iran back then)

[Hani]

Shia using molotov in Bahrayn:

[Hadrami]

Shia using molotov in Bahrayn:

wow, those shia tried to burn them alive not just damage their cars. Is bahrain police have really strict rule of engagement? They didnt even shoot warning shot, just tear gas gun.

[Hani]

If this was the Shiite government of Syria these protesters would have been boiled in oil then force fed to their families.

[Rationalist]

Any country where Shia are not in government and are the opposition, that country is healthy and stable because Shias will not use means of violence and threatening behaviour to have their demands met and use what ever means necessary to overthrow or make the government unsuccessful. But as soon as Shias come in to authority and power the Sunni opposition will turn towards bloodshed, mayhem and murder and will not rest. They don't give a damn. This is the true story and picture. Reality and facts are clear throughout history to prove this. But my dear brothers always like to twist and turn things around and do their best to make Shias look bad as much as they can.

That's very similar to the history of the Yahood in Germany. They were very peaceful, but as soon as they started getting financially stronger the gentiles began to attack them. Likewise, the same case is with the Qadianis. They were very peaceful people in Pakistan. As soon as they started getting stronger they got themselves under pressure.

[Ameen]

Ameen, can you explain what happened when safawids came into rule? ( a hint: majority of population was sunni in iran back then)

Well it's obvious that the Safawids were not Sunni so they automatically would and must have been cruel and bad. If there were Sunnis then we would be praising them and blaming the opposition and or public for everything. Well this is exactly how you think!