As already explained the narration which I quoted is the event that occurred BEFORE, the hadeeth of Bukhari. And it appears inconsistent to you, because of your poor understanding skills. Just demostration of dumbness minimizes my interest to respond, so please try to increase the level of your intelligence, if you wish to receive quality response.
Dear brother, i want everyone here to bear witness that you have claimed the weaker chained event occurred before what i brought forth in the Hadith in al-Bukhari. I also want you to absolutely commit to that, and i want everyone reading this to bear witness this is what you have again reiterated and committed yourself to. When debating me, put aside Adhominem attacks on me, and focus only on the content of my arguments. Whatever you think in side, let us keep things civil and academic and stop these personal attacks. I will demonstrate once again that your attempt to try to reconcile them is very weak.
To understand this scenario, one just requires common sense along with pure intention otherwise, they would end up rejecting established virtues of noble Sahaba, like how khawarij ended. Both hadeeth can easily be reconciled, Initially Umar(Ra), was not just willing to proclaim about his conversion to Islam, but he actually proclaimed this infront of the Mushrikeen. Without being aware that what the exact consequence would be, would it be just a fight or the people would become blood thirsty.
So you are claiming that Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr first met Umar fighting dawn to dusk against the Polytheists, poking at them, sitting on them, going from one polytheist to another and provoking them, and then when Umar had become tired after fighting dawn to dusk, Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr came in and told the people Umar was under his protection, so they dispersed. And then you claim that this is when the Hadith of al-Bukhari applies, when Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr then found Umar in his home, in a state of fear, whereby Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr told him he was under his protection, and told those gathered outside to disperse , and they dispersed again ? With respect dear brother , this is an incredibly weak understanding and can not be accepted and i will show how.
[quoteLooking at both hadeeth we can conclude that, Umar(Ra) experienced the reaction of people after he proclaimed his conversion to Islam. But things went over board when this didn't just stop at physical assault by Mushrikeen. [/quote]
Your weaker report itself portrayed Umar as attacking the Polytheists, rebuking them going from one to another and mocking them. When they then gathered around him, this is when Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr came to his protection and asked them to disperse, and so they dispersed knowing full well he was under the protection of Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr. Therefore there is no way you can then claim Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr came again to Umar and promised his protection when he had already done so in front of the polytheists who gathered around him, and made them disperse. Note, they dispersed and went away.
They want to kill him, as they were aware that his presence would help Islam and Muslims. And a lone person can't do much to protect himself if he finds out that a group of people from the society have plans to kill him, and when people have plans to kill a person, then it's risky that the person roams around putting his life in danger, because this group could anytime attack and stab him finding him off guard. And Umar(Ra) wasn't a demigod of fairy tales to lift gates which 40 plus people couldn't lift, he was a normal man.
A weak interpretation. He knew full well new converts were being killed, and so he decided to go around, brandish his word, poke, hit, rebuke them one after the other, and fight them dawn to dusk until he became tired? How is that not putting your life in danger? If he could not do much to protect himself, how can we believe 'fairy tales' he fought dawn to dusk, poked, hit, sat on, and went from one Kuffar to another and rebuked them?
Hence you see if you try to look these two different events which occurred at different time , in a rational manner then you find them to be finely consistent.
On day one of accepting Islam, Umar(Ra) proclaimed his conversion to Islam. Mushrikeen reacted over this by attacking him and he fought them till he was exhausted and was eventually aas bin wail came in and saved him. (Notice in this event aas bin wail didn't give Umar(Ra) protection, he just saved him in this scenario.
Brother are you aware what you quoted explicitly demonstrates he indeed was given protection?
"They gathered around him and he said: What do you want? Whilst they were like that, there came a man ( Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr) who was wearing a silken hullah(suit) and an embroidered shirt. He said: What is the matter with you? They said: The son of al-Khattab has changed his religion. He said: So what? A man can choose a religion for himself.
Do you think that Bani Adi will let you get away with it if you kill their companion?" Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr explicitly tells the people who want to attack Umar he is under there protection. Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr is also fully aware they wanted to kill Umar. If it as you claim, that Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr then went to the house of Umar and saw him in fear and did not realise he was scared because the people wanted to kill him, then it is in direct contradiction to the hadith where he saw with his own eyes that people wanted to kill him because he converted, warned them, and told him that his tribe will never allow them to harm Umar.
While you are continually insulting me , there is no doubt what i have said is absolutely crystal clear in demonstrating the contradiction between the two reports and the error of your attempt to reconcile them.
Following this event on the same day or the other, the second event occurred as the fire in the hearts of Mushrikeen didn't end, they wanted to kill Umar(ra). So in this one Umar(ra) stayed in his home, as people were planning to kill him. So there was no fighting from Umar in this scenario. And in this one you find aas bin wail extending his tribal protection to Umar(ra), unlike in the previous scenario.
But Al-`As bin Wail As-Sahmi Abu `Amr said in the weaker report you yourself quoted that "Do you think that Bani Adi will let you get away with it if you kill their companion?" Is this not explicit protection of Umar under the tribe? Did he not explicitly see they wanted to kill Umar, and then offered the protection of Umar? If so, why would he then go to Umar and ask him why he feared, when he himself saw and accused them of wanting to kill him? Why would he offer his protection again when he had already done so infant of the polytheists?
So you see these are two different scenarios , both consistent with each other.
They are absolutely inconsistent with each other. The weaker chained report you have given me is likely due to someone mixing up reports and it contradicts the authentic chain.
It's seems that finding that your argument was busted, you have resorted to lying like a typical Shia when he realizes that he is losing the argument. I demand that you please provide evidence for the highlighted portion in red about aas bin wail saying Umar(Ra) was under their protection. Because what I find is that he dispersed them saying something else nothing about protection.
Once again, not once have i ever insulted you or made disparaging sectarian comments. Stop the Adhominem attacks, and respond to my point. I am the first to acknowledge something, as i did when you rightly proved the weakness of the hadith in Khaybar. However it is a weak report , and not a Mawdu report.
So brother displaying dishonesty and then claiming that the hadeeth is not rational, are not good traits, you will lose your whole credibility by such display of dishonesty and stupidity based arrogance.
A sahabi who witnessed these events knows this better, than a dishonest Shia cyber critic, who is deprived of understanding skills as well.
Half of your post consisted of Adhominem attacks. When you read this reply, you might if you are objective take back everything you have just said, and i will accept your apology and your retraction without making any judgements on your intelligence because we are human and we err.