salamu alakium every1 and especially link,
link everytime you try to prove imamah in the quran you use verses which are clearly not about imamah let me refute them here and also let you know something
firstly 5:55, i refuted that here:
http://forum.twelvershia.net/imamah-ghaybah/was-abu-bakr-or-ali-the-first-caliph/msg17753/#msg17753regarding 2:124, the verse is not clear at all,
next up hani refuted it: Salam,
In this thread I'll take the Shia methodology in understanding this verse:
According to the Shia understanding of this verse, Ibrahim (as) was made an Imam, promoted to a special status! He also asked God if there will be other Imams from his progeny.
{And [mention, O Muhammad], when Abraham was tried by his Lord with commands and he fulfilled them. [Allah] said, "Indeed, I will make you an Imam for the people." [Abraham] said, "And of my descendants?" [Allah] said, "My covenant does not include the wrongdoers."} [2:124]
The Shia say the Imams from his progeny are `Ali and his sons. We have glad tidings, the Qur'an does in fact mention the Imams from the progeny of Ibrahim (as) by name!
After mentioning how God saved Ibrahim (as) from the fire, it says:
{And We gave him Isaac and Jacob in addition, and all [of them] We made righteous. - And We made them Imams guiding by Our command. And We inspired to them the doing of good deeds, establishment of prayer, and giving of zakah; and they were worshippers of Us.} [21:72-73]
So there you have it, not `Ali or any of his sons, turns out the Imams according to the Qur'an are Ibrahim (as) and 2 prophets from Ibrahim's (as) progeny, Ishaq & Ya`qub (as). They all received revelation as well, this seems to be the defining ability of an Imam.
In the Qur'an, we've not seen yet anyone be awarded the rank of "Imam" (acc to Shia understanding) while NOT being a prophet. Based on this Qur'anic concept, an Imam can either be that of goodness or that of evil, the evil ones are impostors while the good ones are the prophets.
next up if iammah is from asl ul deen and we will be kuffar in the hereafter for rejecting 1 imam, there should be a clear verse, the verse 2:124 is not clear at all.
also i could make this claim, abraham cmae and from ishmael the quraish came. the verse says from my profeny, so i could make the claim it is about abu bakr and muawiya. the verse is 0% clear and i dont believe anyone who reads the verse would believe in 12 infallible imams after the prophet muhammad saws you have to follow and if you dont follow him you will be a kafir.
next 4:59, it says: O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.
the arabic says: يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ فَإِن تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ وَالرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ذَٰلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا
i dont see at all how this can mean 12 infallible imams you have to follow i showed this to one of my non muslim friends, he thought ok. i asked him, does this mean that there are multiple people you have to follow after the death of the prophet muhammad that will have ilm ul ghayb and they are infallible and higher than all other prophets except for muhammad, he laughed at me
firstly it is clear from the verse there is no complete obedience to the ones in authority amongst you, but there is complete authority to allah and the messenger saws. and in the end he says refer it to allah and his messenger. why does allah swt not say refer it to allah and the messenger and the ones in authority.
also the imams had ilm ul ghayb and so much knowledge why can we not refer something to them, arent hey infalibe why shouldnt we refer it to them
also this verse is actually problematic to you, it says obey allah and obey the messenger, why was their no obey before saying the one in authority, also why dont we refer it to them. because they are not high like prophets, because they are not the rule makers, they arent really infallible because infallibles could fix mmistakes so we should refer it to them
also the arabic says: وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ
the last phrase, kum, shows from among you. this shows the verse is very general, and we have no imam among us today because the 12th one wentn into al ghayba al kubra, the major occultation and he is now no more accesible.
the verse is clearly general. and has nothing to do with imamsa who are infallible who have ilm ul ghayb
to close it off, as i have shown i have refuted thag 5:55 is about ali, similarly hani has done this with 2:124 and shown that 4:59 is nothing more than a general verse
so there is nothing clear in the quran about imamahm
but there are some ambigous things, what does allah swt say about following ambigous things and rejecting the claritiy
quran 3:7, It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muhammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific. As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them].
so stop appealing to the ambigous verses