West favours Shiaiam

[Optimus Prime]

I got this from a WhatsApp group.

Forwarded message, worth a read

Emancipate Your Mind from the Great Deception

1》Why are there no Shias in Guantanamo?
2》Why does the West not include Shi'i movements on its list of terrorist organisations?
3》What is the true role of Hezbollah in South Lebanon?
4》What is the reason why American drones target Ansar al-Shariah but not the Houthis whereas both of them are in Yemen?
5》Why is it that France refuses to add Hezbollah to the list of terrorist organisations?
6》Why will the West not allow any Sunni Islamic Government (whether it is in Afghanistan, Somalia, Mali or Yemen), yet they allow Iran to stand as a Shi'i state (run *strictly* by Shi'i law) and super-power in the Gulf?
7》Why do they allow Shias to spread in Africa but they do not allow Sunni charitable organisations?

✋🏻STOP AND PONDER💡

Dr Majdi Rab'i, an expert historian says:

I spent ten years of my life with the Shias. I studied their history, traced their legacies and influential men, and scrutinised their scuffles with the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah etc.

I done this during my academic journeys to Iraq and Iran, due to which I recieved my Masters and my Doctorate in Shi'i History. For a long period, I stayed with and observed the Batini Shias, who made lawaful (for themselves) the blood of Muslims and spread Shiasm with iron and fire (i.e. extreme violence) until they forced (almost the entire) Iranian public to embrace Shiasm! They forced millions of Muslims to convert to Shiasm. Historians have recorded that one million Muslims were slaughtered by the Rawafid (the pejorative name of the Shiah). Consequently, Iran was changed from a Sunni country to a Zoroastrian and Rafidhi state.

The dark history (of the Shias) is that they even aligned themselves with the Jews and Christians against the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah. It was this alliance that prevented the Ottomans from conquering the entire Europe after they had already conquered Eastern Europe and entered the the heart thereof.

They laid seige upon Vienna but the backstabbing and attacks from the rear by the Safawids forced the Ottomans to abort their seige of Vienna and return to the Eastern countries.

Thus they destroyed the chance of conquering Europe and spreading Islam amongst its people. This is the reason one of the great Western historians stated, "If it was not for the treachery of the Shi'i Safawids towards the Ottoman caliphate and their attacks from the rear, the Ottomans would have conquered the entire Europe and it would have been an Islamic continent."

A historical fact which left me dazed and I simply could not believe that a human (even if he did not even claim to be Muslim) could perpetrate such an act, I.e. that which the Shia Qaramitah did to the Ka'bah on the Eighth of Zil-Hijjah 317 A.H. They attacked the Hujjaj and killed more than thirty thousand people. They destroyed the Zam-Zam dome, removed the door of the Ka'bah as well as its cover and they slaughtered those Hujjaj who clung onto it. Thereafter the dumped the corpses of the slain Muslims in the well of Zam-Zam. Finally, they removed the Hajar Aswad and took it to their country.

Thats when I understood the reality of Ibn Taymiyah's statement regarding the Batini Shias. He stated that they are worse in their disbelief than the Jews and Christians and it is a greater responsibility to fight them than to fight the disbelievers, as they are in the category of renegades.

Today, as we see what is happening in Syria as far as worshipping Asad, killing and slaughtering the Ahlus Sunnah in a way that was not even done by the Jews or the Tartars, destruction and desecration of Masjids etc. I am convinced that Bashar Asad and his sect (Nusairi Alawi Shias) are from the progeny of the Batiniyyah Qaramitah.

The words of my Lord are so true, 'They are offspring, one from the other"! It is as if history is repeating itself.

Dr Majdi Rib'i
Specialist Historian

The least that we can do at this moment is to spread these facts so the Ahlus Sunnah and the entire world emerge from (Shi'i) deception.

We humbly appeal that you do not hold back in spreading this message as far and wide as possible.

[Sheikh]

Maybe things are different in other countries, or perhaps my government has a different policy than the one that they present to the people, but here in America it seems to be a little different. Iran is demonized as the most evil country in the world. Bashar Al-Assad is seen as an evil tyrant and we must support the "moderate rebels" (i.e. Sunnis).


This opinion is starting to change, however. The new popular opinion is that all Muslims and Middle-Easterners are evil and should be fought. But that's a Trump thing. Before Trump, I didn't see anything positive about Shi'ism or the Shia states in our media.

[Evil twelvers]

Evil people support each other, this is why the west likes shias.

[Optimus Prime]

Allah knows best.

[Rationalist]

Iran has been under extreme pressure in 1979. It was demonized for the hostage crises, and for the fatwa against Salman Rushdie. However, after that they have been very careful. Also, unlike Sunni extremist they never admit their hatred against their enemies. Ahmadinejad made empty threats against Israel, and that only got Iran under sanctions. Currently, they got involved in Syria, and were about to loose Syria until Russia stepped in. After Asad won the elections, Iran decided to settle 300 12er Shia families to near the shrine of Zaineb (sa).

Also, despite their takfiri views they still have unity conferences every year inviting Sunnis from all over the world. Lately, the who country celebrated Meelad to attract more attention.
 

[Evil twelvers]

Iran has never been under any pressure, that country is filled with  snakes.Shias only have unity conferences for show, they just want to deceive Muslims. https://youtu.be/fYSWTek6kBY

[Rationalist]

That's what gives them the upper hand. They are able to hide their extremism and their true agenda.

As for the sanctions, this is similar to what happened in Iraq. Under Sadaam when Iraq was put under sanctions he was still living in palaces, but the Iraqis suffered the most. Likewise this was the case with Iran too.

[Musaafir]

1) Because not many Shia are doing Jihad in such a way that would land them in such a place, and the only place where US troops and Shia have actively fought is Iraq, and that is sparingly.

2) Hezbollah is included on most lists. Perhaps because Shia organizations don't commit as many heinous acts of terrorism like Sunni ones do?

3) I don't know, you should ask them, they will probably tell you. I don't see what this has to do with the West.

4) Both of those are regional organizations largely keeping within their borders, whearas the organizations the US bombs are international like Al Qaeda, etc. The US put weapons sanctions on the them not too far back anyway.

5) Probably has something to do with Pro-Palestinian sentiment. Other than their attack on the US embassy, and not supporting Israel, they haven't done much to warrant such a thing. They treat religious minorities (including you Sunnis )well and don't force Sharia on a people that don't want it.

 6) The US begrudgingly allows Iran to exist because they don't want to go through the trouble of fighting them. I don't know if you've noticed, but the US has not made it easy for Iran. The US is great allies with Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf States who have incorporated some elements of Sharia. You see what you want to see.

7) "Charitable organizations". Name an instance when the West has prevented an (Islamic ) charitable organization from working in Africa. The US doesn't need to intervene in Kenya, the government and Al-Shabab have been doing a fine job in wiping them out.

[MuslimAnswers]

That's what gives them the upper hand. They are able to hide their extremism and their true agenda.

As for the sanctions, this is similar to what happened in Iraq. Under Sadaam when Iraq was put under sanctions he was still living in palaces, but the Iraqis suffered the most. Likewise this was the case with Iran too.

Difficult to say that the West would dislike Iran, especially when they are now explicitly saying that Israel is not even their main concern, but rather a second-tier enemy:

http://irantag.net/?p=1115

Thus they are in the same category as say, Egypt, who can talk like a lion as much as they want, but everyone knows is actually on the same page as the 'Zionist entity' and is not really that concerned on a truly strategic level about this.