Hahaha... now it's my turn to laugh. You just typed something for the sake of typing something.
What I said was Shia claims that human needs infallible imam to guide, explain, elaborate sharia, clear up confusion, etc. or else it goes against Lutf of Allah. And suddenly for more than 1,100 years, Shia rely on fallible ulama' for all those functions that I listed above. Don't you find that weird and irony?
You are laughing not because it's funny, but because you are nervous and was surprised by what I had in the mystery box. Yes under your nose and your whole doctrine, we need Imams to guide us just like Ibrahim a.s. was an Imam and explained and elaborated his sharia. Opse. Second of all we don't rely on fallible ulama like the Sunnis do like sheep, they are scholars who have studied books all their lives who inform us of things we might not know as ordinary people.
Are those scholars of yours infallible? If not infallible, it goes against the Lutf of Allah. Don't you see that?
Like I said, you are worse than a donkey I have to repeat it more than once. I told you our scholars and us follow ONE imam a.s. Our scholars are fallible and make mistakes. The only difference is that they spend more time in studying religion.
Seems like you are having quite a tough time trying to understand a simple statement.
I repeat what I said.
Shia claims that it is the Lutf of Allah that human is bestowed guidance via infallible imams whose function are to explain, elaborate Shari’a (divine law) for the people and clear up confusing things and events which may happen in each era.
However today (or even for the pst 1,000 years), Shia seek fallible people like Khamenei, Sistani, Shirazi, etc. to explain, elaborate Shari’a (divine law) and clear up confusing things. By not having infallible around to guide people, doesn't that goes against the Lutf of Allah as Shia claim?