Bukhari 600 000 Hadeeth

[Farid]

Brother Solomon, perhaps you should join our Zello chatroom. It would be easier to explain through audio.

[Solomon]

Brother Solomon, perhaps you should join our Zello chatroom. It would be easier to explain through audio.

Its quite easier to understand here also till we discuss and not debate,brother if i had done any mistake or misunderstood any of your point you could write it as you wrote previously.

[Farid]

It has taken a day and a half to express a point of view on this forum brother.

Through voice, conversations are made easier.

We will not be debating. I just want to explain my view clearly.

[scusemyenglish]

In Bukhari we have 7563 hadith.

If we divide 600 000 with 7563 we have 80.

So we can admitte that for 1 hadith in bukhari we have 80 chains of narration? or it's wrong?

[Farid]

In Bukhari we have 7563 hadith.

If we divide 600 000 with 7563 we have 80.

So we can admitte that for 1 hadith in bukhari we have 80 chains of narration? or it's wrong?

You forgot all the weak hadiths that Al Bukhari didn't include.

Some narrations have more than 80 chains. Al Tabarani had 150 chains for one hadith: من كذب علي متعمدا

He had much more but didn't write them down because it would be repetitive.

[scusemyenglish]

Salam.

 someone can provide narations when Bukhari talk about this 600 000 hadith?

[Ibn Yahya]

Its beneficial brother because more number of chain will help to make the hadith to reach at mutawatir level and we know any sahih hadith reaching to mutawatir level in world of hadiths holds much more value.

I believe thats called wasting people's time just to make a Hadith look more authentic. Which is wrong (and something websites like al-Islam and answering-ansar are guilty of). If a Hadith is Sahih, its Sahih. If its Mutawatir then it just further removes doubt. Is it really necessary to have several versions of exactly the same Hadith to the point where your book contains 600,000 Hadiths that are mostly the same? No. Its pointless and a waste of time.

No brother ,neither sunni nor shia can say this that laws are exactly preserved otherwise sunnis wouldn't have opted   4(or more than one) school of Law in a single time period.

Inevitably some people will disagree on how a text should be viewed. Its ludricous to expect the millions of Muslims to all have the same opinion. That doesn't mean it hasn't been preserved.