Then don't call me a dimwit if you think that's an insult to you lot.
I was actually referring to the rest of you all.
Of course I never amaze you because I'm always ready and prepared for you.
Undoubtedly, you are always ready and prepared for me to make a mockery out of you.
Prove the punishment from the Qur'an just as you were quick and swift to prove the other punishment.
Alhamdulilah, at least you admitted that your other point has been utterly refuted. Now, instead of posing more challenges, have some shame and issue an apology. If not, at least ponder over the following Shi'i belief.
"Kulaini has, according to reliable chains of narrators, narrated from Abi Salmah that he said: I have heard Imam Sadiq (a.s.) saying:
We are the group whose obedience has been made a must for the creation by the Lord Almighty and people must recognize us (they cannot do without our recognition) and people are not helpless in knowing us and
the one who knows us with our Imamate is a believer and the one who denies is a disbeliever and the one who neither knows us nor denies us is like a man of weak belief and misguided until he returns to our compulsory obedience, the obedience which has been made obligatory by Allah. If such a fellow dies in a condition of this misguidance, it is for the Almighty Allah either to punish him or to forgive him."
Taken from:
https://www.al-islam.org/hayat-al-qulub-vol3-allamah-muhammad-baqir-al-majlisi/part-6-it-obligatory-obey-true-imamsWithout complete obedience, you are a disbeliever, according to your own theology. So why do you disregard your "infallible" Imams (ra) when it is authentically narrated from them that refusal to pay or give Zakah makes one an apostate who can then be subjected to capital punishment?
Is it necessary that everything serious and important has to be from the Qur'an? If yes then prove from the Qur'an that Messengers and Prophets don't leave anything behind for inheritance or to be inherited.
I am convinced that Prophets (asws) do not leave inheritance, a fact attested to by Shi'i and Sunni authentic narrations. This point, however, takes center stage when discussing Fadak so instead of getting into discussions regarding this narration, I nip the whole argument in the bud.
The Qur'an clearly forbids Fay from having an individual owner, or a group of owners, having exclusive rights to it. Therefore, it can neither be gifted nor inherited. Open-and-shut case.
Prove and back this hadith from the Qur'an.
I do not have to prove anything anymore; I have killed two birds with one stone. Setting aside your flip-flopping belief that Fadak was inheritance but it was also a gift, Surah Hashr clearly forbids Fadak from being gifted or inherited.
You accuse a companion of the Prophet s.a.w (Malik bin Nuwayrah) and other companions alongside him of such a hideous crime?
A Shi'i being upset that a "companion" of the Prophet (saw) is "accused" of a "hideous crime"? The world must be coming to an end. However, notice your next sentence: "Because if you don't then Abu Bakr and Khalid go down really badly."
That is your level of hypocrisy. Two consecutive sentences and you commit the same mistake you wrongly accuse us of.
So companions can lose their companionship? But according to you only despite not having clear reports. Not according to anybody else even with a genuine and clear reason? Pull the other one.
Basic definition of being a Companion: accepting Islam, having met the Prophet (saw) and having died with eemaan (or as Muslim).
Are you denying that Muslims, in the past and today, have rejected Islam?
Fatima along with the Prophet's s.a.w other relations had a right to inheritance just like anyone else. The Qur'an says so. You think they don't because Abu Bakr said so. Just as simple as that.
No problem! You will have to go back in time, find the possessions of the Prophet (saw) and give them to Fatima (ra). So long as you understand that Surah Hashr forbids Fadak from being inherited by Fatima (ra) or gifted to her.
Oh by the way, while you are in the past, also ask your first and second "infallible" Imams (ra) as to why they did not reclaim Fadak despite being the Caliphs and therefore, in charge of all the affairs of the Ummah.
We're not talking about being owned. We are talking about inheritance.
Are you being extra stupid this morning? Can you inherit the Buckingham Palace? Why not? Because your father does not own it. Owning a property is a necessary condition for your offspring to inherit it.
The Prophet s.a.w was obstructed from writing a will and then his relations were deprived from inheritance. Good show. Brilliant. Bravo. Well done.
A group of fallible individuals were able to do all this and four "infallible, Divinely Ordained and Aided" individuals (actually 5, if you include the Prophet s.a.w.) could not prevent or reverse these injustices? Brilliant. Bravo. Well done.