Why I believe Shiite Scholars are Khums stealers along with those under them.

[Link]

The Prophet peace be upon him listed their names you say?

Have you read my article on Imamah in Early Shia Societies?

I think I have read it although I am not sure if I did. Can't be bothered with it, to be honest, Quran and Ahlulbayt (as) are the centers of my attention, they clarify and manifest the truth and prove it beyond doubt.

You guys rely on conjecture and try to make the clear proofs of the truth fuzzy is all.

If there is one point in there that you find very strong and would like to prove with it, you can bring it, or if you would like to summarize it.

You guys say I philosophize a lot, at least I do with themes and reflections over Quranic verses, while you guys are all reflecting on pure conjecture and your own relfections that is not supported by Quran and ahadith.

We are to refer back to "God and the Messenger", as the former has provided an explanation of all things to do with guidance, and the latter has clarified the clear message which humanity must hold on to.

[Farid]

http://www.twelvershia.net/2017/02/11/understanding-imamate-early-shia-society/

It isn't long, dude. You will find ample evidences from the Imams and early Shias that the names were not presented from the start. Imams were only appointed before the current one dies.

I can't force you to take a look, but you would be missing out.

[Link]

http://www.twelvershia.net/2017/02/11/understanding-imamate-early-shia-society/

It isn't long, dude. You will find ample evidences from the Imams and early Shias that the names were not presented from the start. Imams were only appointed before the current one dies.

I can't force you to take a look, but you would be missing out.

Do you know what is called spit fire in philosophy?

Bring me the strongest argument from there. If you believe they are all equal, I will just pick one and refute it. Otherwise, spit fire is annoying to deal with.  It's spitting a lot that may look like evidence and make look overwhelming not of the reasons and evidence stands in reality.

It's like Richard Dawkin's book which is spitfire in hope one of the arguments would hold true,  but even Atheist philosophers refuted and showed was all false reasoning and does nothing to do with proofs of God let alone showing God is a delusion.

[kernel]

dirty shia sand niggers

[Zahra]

dirty shia sand niggers

Was the racial slur necessary?

[kernel]

The dirty muslims will get what they deserve for destroying the gods of old!

[Farid]

dirty shia sand niggers

Was the racial slur necessary?

Obviously trolling. =]