TwelverShia.net Forum

ShiaPen responses

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

أبو ماريا المرزم

  • ***
  • Total likes: 15
  • +0/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • Allah grant the Rafidah their seat in Jahannam
  • Religion: Sunni
ShiaPen responses
« on: July 22, 2016, 03:29:14 AM »
They asked how many will be with the one I hate. I said 313

fgss

Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2016, 09:35:57 AM »
I think there is no need to refute everything they argue. They are mostly following their emotions and rejecting the evidences, even from their own books.

Conclusion on incident of pen and paper is here:
http://twelvershia.net/2016/05/03/answer-to-the-calamity-of-thursday-pen-and-paper-hadith/
إِنَّ أَصْدَقَ الْحَدِيثِ كِتَابُ اللَّهِ وَأَحْسَنَ الْهَدْىِ هَدْىُ مُحَمَّدٍ وَشَرَّ الأُمُورِ مُحْدَثَاتُهَا وَكُلَّ مُحْدَثَةٍ بِدْعَةٌ وَكُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ وَكُلَّ ضَلاَلَةٍ فِي النَّارِ

May Allah guide us to the true teachings of Quran and Sunnah of His beloved Prophet (s.a.w.w). Ameen

ShiaMan

Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2016, 01:49:55 AM »
So everyone is in agreement that Caliph Umar refused pen/paper saying the Prophet is possibly delusional; only discussion is why he did what he did.

Correct?

MuslimK

  • *****
  • Total likes: 255
  • +11/-0
  • یا مقلب القلوب ثبت قلبی علی دینک
    • Refuting Shia allegations everywhere
  • Religion: Sunni
Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2016, 02:18:41 AM »
I think there is no need to refute everything they argue. They are mostly following their emotions and rejecting the evidences, even from their own books.

Conclusion on incident of pen and paper is here:
http://twelvershia.net/2016/05/03/answer-to-the-calamity-of-thursday-pen-and-paper-hadith/


That is the best quick response.
در خلافت میل نیست ای بی‌خبر
میل کی آید ز بوبکر و عمر
میل اگر بودی در آن دو مقتدا
هر دو کردندی پسر را پیشوا

عطار نِیشابوری

www.Nahjul-Balagha.net | www.TwelverShia.net | www.ghadirkhumm.com

MuslimK

  • *****
  • Total likes: 255
  • +11/-0
  • یا مقلب القلوب ثبت قلبی علی دینک
    • Refuting Shia allegations everywhere
  • Religion: Sunni
Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2016, 02:36:57 AM »
در خلافت میل نیست ای بی‌خبر
میل کی آید ز بوبکر و عمر
میل اگر بودی در آن دو مقتدا
هر دو کردندی پسر را پیشوا

عطار نِیشابوری

www.Nahjul-Balagha.net | www.TwelverShia.net | www.ghadirkhumm.com

Noor-us-Sunnah

Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2016, 05:47:16 AM »
So everyone is in agreement that Caliph Umar refused pen/paper saying the Prophet is possibly delusional; only discussion is why he did what he did.

Correct?
That's a lie attributed to Umar by enemies of Islam. Umar didn't say those words.

muslim720

Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2016, 02:01:55 PM »
So everyone is in agreement that Caliph Umar refused pen/paper saying the Prophet is possibly delusional; only discussion is why he did what he did.

Correct?

Time and again, I have said this to Shias but it falls upon deaf ears.  Actually, the problem is top down.  You see, the criteria to make a sound judgment (adopted by scholars) is to take all the Qur'anic verses and narrations - regarding a matter - into consideration and then deliver a verdict.  If you read all the authentic narrations regarding the Incident of Pen and Paper, you will find more than one of them not even mention Umar [ra].  Logic dictates that if he was in the middle of creating a scene, his name would not be missing from any of the reports (talking about this incident).  On top of all this, there is not a single report which states that Umar [ra] was the one who used the word "delusional", "delirious" or anything your mind wishes to imagine.
"Our coward ran from those in authority" - Iceman (admitting the truth regarding his 12th Imam)

أبو ماريا المرزم

  • ***
  • Total likes: 15
  • +0/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • Allah grant the Rafidah their seat in Jahannam
  • Religion: Sunni
Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2016, 01:52:20 AM »
So everyone is in agreement that Caliph Umar refused pen/paper saying the Prophet is possibly delusional; only discussion is why he did what he did.

Correct?

Umar Ra said no such thing. And in your sources, Abdullah the son of Ali Ra thought he hadAli Ra) had lost his sense when Ali asked for him to rub his cheek on the ground.

Is he a Nasibi too?
They asked how many will be with the one I hate. I said 313

ShiaMan


أبو ماريا المرزم

  • ***
  • Total likes: 15
  • +0/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • Allah grant the Rafidah their seat in Jahannam
  • Religion: Sunni
Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2016, 08:15:24 AM »
Umar Ra said no such thing.
Calamity of Thursday?
http://www.sunnah.com/bukhari/58/10
http://www.sunnah.com/muslim/25/29


The narrations you brought up support what I said. The narration didn't specify who asked if he was delirious. Umar Ra was not specified. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ali Ra was present as well, ridht?
They asked how many will be with the one I hate. I said 313

ShiaMan

Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #10 on: August 01, 2016, 10:19:42 PM »
Umar Ra said no such thing.
Calamity of Thursday?
http://www.sunnah.com/bukhari/58/10
http://www.sunnah.com/muslim/25/29


The narrations you brought up support what I said. The narration didn't specify who asked if he was delirious. Umar Ra was not specified. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ali Ra was present as well, ridht?
The fact that Caliph Umar who responded is evident in the hadith.
Another one (albeit different words) - http://www.sunnah.com/bukhari/75/30

Are you implying that it could have been Ali who refused? Then why were Caliph Umar and the people with him kicked out? Also this was the last conversation between the Prophet and Caliph Umar.

أبو ماريا المرزم

  • ***
  • Total likes: 15
  • +0/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • Allah grant the Rafidah their seat in Jahannam
  • Religion: Sunni
Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #11 on: September 22, 2016, 10:06:05 PM »
Umar Ra said no such thing.
Calamity of Thursday?
http://www.sunnah.com/bukhari/58/10
http://www.sunnah.com/muslim/25/29


The narrations you brought up support what I said. The narration didn't specify who asked if he was delirious. Umar Ra was not specified. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ali Ra was present as well, ridht?
The fact that Caliph Umar who responded is evident in the hadith.
Another one (albeit different words) - http://www.sunnah.com/bukhari/75/30

Are you implying that it could have been Ali who refused? Then why were Caliph Umar and the people with him kicked out? Also this was the last conversation between the Prophet and Caliph Umar.

The point we're trying to prove is that he called him delirious, not that he responded in general. No, I'm asking, if Ali was present, why didn't he do anything? Or was he supposed to stay patient like the broken ribs melodrama?
They asked how many will be with the one I hate. I said 313

Rationalist

Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2016, 06:48:07 PM »
Here is what Ibn Abil Hadeed al Mutazilli wrote on the subject.


ʿUmar’s words and character had an apparent dryness and arrogance. One who heard him interpreted his words in a way different than ʿUmar himself intended. One who narrated from him did so thinking that he actually meant what he said. Among these narrations is the words he said at the time of the Apostle of Allah’s final illness. Refuge is sought with Allah from the assumption that he meant what he apparently said. In factuality, he said those words in congruence with his coarse nature and did not think before saying what he did. It would have been better had he said “unconscious” or “fainted due to illness”. It is impossible that he meant anything else from these words.

أبو ماريا المرزم

  • ***
  • Total likes: 15
  • +0/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • Allah grant the Rafidah their seat in Jahannam
  • Religion: Sunni
Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2016, 08:39:51 AM »
Would it alright to take the work of the Mu'tazila? They had some hardcore jahmi beliefs
They asked how many will be with the one I hate. I said 313

Hani

Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #14 on: September 30, 2016, 12:56:26 AM »
Would it alright to take the work of the Mu'tazila? They had some hardcore jahmi beliefs

Take whatever is useful in anybody's works and dismiss what you believe is falsehood. Apply this to everything.
عَلامَةُ أَهْلِ الْبِدَعِ الْوَقِيعَةُ فِي أَهْلِ الأَثَرِ. وَعَلامَةُ الْجَهْمِيَّةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ مُشَبِّهَةً. وَعَلامَةُ الْقَدَرِيَّةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ مُجَبِّرَةً. وَعَلامَةُ الزَّنَادِقَةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ الأَثَرِ حَشْوِيَّةً

Religion = simple & clear

Rationalist

Re: ShiaPen responses
« Reply #15 on: October 02, 2016, 05:15:22 AM »
Would it alright to take the work of the Mu'tazila? They had some hardcore jahmi beliefs

They were very fair on history. The 12ers study them and only quote them when it suits their agenda. Then they mix their tabarra in criticism of the sahaba.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
3 Replies
2406 Views
Last post December 11, 2014, 09:17:57 PM
by Hani
2 Replies
2458 Views
Last post December 31, 2015, 08:03:27 AM
by أبو ماريا المرزم
4 Replies
1706 Views
Last post July 15, 2015, 07:35:06 PM
by muslim720
0 Replies
1032 Views
Last post June 29, 2017, 06:24:00 PM
by fgss