Now this is double standard.
If you want to see what double standard or hypocrisy whatever you want to call it, then it is, calling certain thing from a Sunni Scholar as LIE, but when it is proven that the Scholar was falsely accused rather, rather you hid or chopped off the crucial words, then it becomes a MISTAKE. So when such a person is out here to accuse me doing double standard it doesn't bother me, i just say look in the mirror first.
On one hand you are defending people, who have committed major sins throughout their life, only because there is a hadith about the gald tidings. And how he got there is another story.
The problem with Haters is that they walk the path of injustice while judging people whom they hate. And we remind them to be just, by reminding those fools that, look at the other side of the coin as well in regards to life of the people whom they hate, their life is filled with major good deeds, major sacrifices for Islam, due to which they were promised Jannah. And we are reminding those sick haters the teachings of Quran.
O you who believe! Stand out firmly for Allah and be just witnesses and let not the enmity and hatred of others make you avoid justice. Be just: that is nearer to piety, and fear Allah. Verily, Allah is Well-Acquainted with what you do} [Al-Maeda 5:8].
There is also a hadith which says eventually every muslim will entre jannah. So does it means that we should not point out anyone's mistakes or sins, because the fate of every muslim is in the end jannah. That's the major issue with ahlul sunnah and perhaps the main reason of shia-sunni rift since centuries. See Quran 4:135 and 5:8.
Now, I want to point out that the topic is being changed.
Entering Jannah EVENTUALLY and Entering Jannah directly has a difference. How is it different? See the example of a Badri Sahabi who committed a Major sin, yet Prophet(S) didn't didn't apply punishment on him, citing the reason of him being a Badri Sahabi and having special virtue. Now you cannot pick a general report and start equating it with the specific virtue mentioned about Badri Sahaba. Nor does a general report undermine the status of specific virtue mentioned about Badri Sahaba.
And you think Engr. Mirza is alone is this thing. Youtube is full of the lies of almost every present day scholar from every school of thought. Big liars and deviated people are actually those who are following and defending fairy tales, super natural things etc.
I don't trust on what you say, because you yourself have lost your trustworthiness. And i disagree with you, there are scholars who on youtube who are honest and trustworthy. But yes they make mistakes, but the problem with some Zanadiqa is that, they try to equate mistakes with lies. Lying is a different thing and being mistaken is a different thing.
I am not his regular listner or a die hard fan, neither of ummayds, and I do not agree with him in whatever he says. He has his own shortcomings but his most of the stuff is based on only primary sunni books unlike many others.
If someone mixes little poison in one part in a Biryani plate and serves people, my recommendation would be to avoid all of it. I agree he goes mention some truthful things but the problem is his mixing lies, which lay people can't figure out. And this was what the other heretics like Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani used to do as well, even he used to mix truth with lies.
Please quote his other major lies and blunders, I will email him and see how he responds, as he often says he is open to critisism. Lets see.
I'm planning to make a video collecting all his LIES not mistakes, and compiling into one video. So, do one thing send him this lie of his, if he apologizes then I'll share others to you so that he apologizes for all, if he doesn't then he deserves to be exposed and called a liar.
No. It's not a established historical fact. http://muslimscholars.info/manage.php?submit=scholar&ID=3
Not all reports in support of other claim are weak. Mashoor and reliable are two different things. Even Imam Ibn Kathir himself is Mash'hoor but not reliable compared to other historians.
What do you mean "not reliable compared to other historians"? Actually you are a nobody and untrustworthy, keep this in mind. While Imam Ibn Katheer is highly trustworthy scholar. And when you have an authentic report from a SAHABI showing that Umar(RA) was stabbed on 26th Dhul hijjah and died 3 days later, then that is superior to any later Scholars disagreement with it.
23 Replies
10042 Views
March 30, 2015, 03:55:19 PM
