Link has been temporarily banned

[Farid]

Alsalam alaykum,

Link has been temporarily banned for his disrespectful and condescending attitude. His ability to post on our boards is a privilege and not a right. I have tolerated him for two years and a half and it was only after consulting other members that we decided to take this action.

Inshallah when he comes back, he will be able to contribute in a beneficial way.

[Hani]

Makes sense, he's been allowed to write everything he wished to write without any censorship or restriction and this is our policy towards all Shia members. My biggest issue with link was always the quality of his posts, to me I'd ban for low quality posts that no one can derive benefit from.

[Hadrami]

well most shias so called refutation are low quality. How can we decide which is which. Id ban link due to posting too many new threads at the same time

[Farid]

well most shias so called refutation are low quality.

Obviously that isn't a good enough reason to ban.

[Zlatan Ibrahimovic]

I don't disagree with this decision.

[Zlatan Ibrahimovic]

well most shias so called refutation are low quality. How can we decide which is which. Id ban link due to posting too many new threads at the same time

Lol, most of the threads on here by Sunnis are not just low quality, but garbage quality. I occassionally look back at the older threads on this website if I am in the mood for a laugh.

[Mythbuster1]

Alhamdulillah

Peace at last

[iceman]

well most shias so called refutation are low quality. How can we decide which is which. Id ban link due to posting too many new threads at the same time

And what about the Sunis? Do they have a free pass? ☺

[iceman]

Makes sense, he's been allowed to write everything he wished to write without any censorship or restriction and this is our policy towards all Shia members. My biggest issue with link was always the quality of his posts, to me I'd ban for low quality posts that no one can derive benefit from.

LOW QUALITY POSTS? And how exactly would you decide this? Well it's obvious.....It has to be a Shia. Can't be anybody else. ☺

[Zlatan Ibrahimovic]

Makes sense, he's been allowed to write everything he wished to write without any censorship or restriction and this is our policy towards all Shia members. My biggest issue with link was always the quality of his posts, to me I'd ban for low quality posts that no one can derive benefit from.

LOW QUALITY POSTS? And how exactly would you decide this? Well it's obvious.....It has to be a Shia. Can't be anybody else. ☺

Good point, may Allah bless you. "Low quality" is subjective. For example, to me, probably 90% of the topics created by Sunnis on here are low quality although they act like they are genius discoveries.

"Low quality" would be used to censor legitimate threads and questions, which for example I and you create and post.

@Hani so far the policy is working fine, I actually have a little bit of respect for your website due to it's policy concerning censorship. Keep it this way

[zaid_ibn_ali]

The problem with link is that he posts like a bot. Constant repetitive replies. Pointless waffle. It was just too tiresome reading his posts & deciphering through all the philosophical mumbo jumbo.

[Farid]

"Low quality" would be used to censor legitimate threads and questions, which for example I and you create and post.

Agreed.