TwelverShia.net Forum

Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #40 on: March 29, 2015, 07:25:44 PM »
Why did Saudi get involved with a poor country like Yemen? Have they lost their minds ?

Have they lost their minds??? It's funny you ask this. They don't have a mind that is in the interest of the benefit of the Muslims and the welfare of Islam. Al e Saood want to spread their ideology and influence in Yemen but the man incharge didn't want this and their interference, so they used Iran as an excuse to take action and over throw him.

Point to be noted, Palestine is mostly Sunni and so is Hammas and Fatah, where are Al e Salood when it comes to them??? Has Saudi regime ever though of helping them in any way what so ever??? They don't give a toss about Islam or the Muslims. They just want to spread their ideology.


Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #41 on: March 29, 2015, 07:27:13 PM »
Well, Iran shouldn't bother with Yemen, so Saudi's won't either.

They are not Ahle Sunnah and they certainly don't care about the Ahle Sunnah.

Huh? Who r the ahlus sunnah than? & if they are not ahlu sunnah what are they?

Khawarij!

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #42 on: March 29, 2015, 07:33:30 PM »
Why did Saudi get involved with a poor country like Yemen? Have they lost their minds ?

speak for yourself, you dont have relatives there. Id rather they destroy those wilayat faqih influenced puppets before Iran make Yaman another Syria & Iraq.

Iran did't make Syria and Iraq, they were made and were stable by Assad and Saddam. It's America and its allies ( friends of Saudi Arabia) who made the mess in Syria and Iraq by the help of Saudia. As far as Wilayath e Faqeeh is concerned, I understand your feeling that there is only one Shia dominant ruled country and you are so afraid of it. But the Saudi influence is all over the place, in the name of extremism and terrorism and the world is dealing with it rather than crying over it.

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #43 on: March 29, 2015, 08:00:45 PM »
Saudi support the 1st gulf war, but they need Saddam to stay in power but not powerful enough to invade their country.

On the other hand, Iran support the 1st & 2nd gulf war, the invasion & occupation of Iraq. Iran support the invasion & occupation of Afghanistan.

Iran has done worse than Saudi. The difference is, Sunni are not blindly supporting Saudi whatever they do while Shia wilayat faqih puppet like you always do that no matter how bad Iran is doing. Even when its supporting Bashar regime.

Alhamdulillah that event in Syria has revealed the true face of Iran & its Shia supporters.


The Saudis have done bad but you never seem to mention and talk about it. Why??? Start a thread on this and list and point out all the bad Saudis have done and balance the equation.

The Saudis were scared that Saddam might attack them and invade their country, so they asked America and its Allies for help and supported the 1st Gulf war to reduce Saddam's arsenal, so the threat would be removed??? Really

This is the same Saddam we are talking about who made a claim that he would attack and invade Iran with in two weeks because Iran was going though its internal problems because of the revolution. He went ahead but couldn't do it.

Who supported Saddam against Iran knowing that he was an aggressor and an invader who broke international law??? Saudi, Kuwait along with other gulf states and America and its allies. It took the Iran and Iraq war 8 years but they couldn't invade Iran.

So who are war criminals??? Who broke international law, not once but on many occasions??? How did Saddam get such an arsenal??? The first Gulf war took place not because Saudi and Gulf states were under threat but because they decided to clear the mess they had made. This is what the first Gulf war was All about.

Iran never supported America and its allies. Never by air, sea or land. The second Gulf war took place because of American and its allies accusation that Saddam had obtained W.M.D. This was not true because firstly Saddam's nuclear plant was destroyed by Israeli operation in 1984, through Israeli air strikes on its nuclear reactor. And secondly the first Gulf war took place for the purpose and reason to reduce Saddam's arsenal.

So I don't know what you are talking about. You need to do your homework and get your facts right.

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #44 on: March 29, 2015, 08:10:20 PM »


speak for yourself, you dont have relatives there. Id rather they destroy those wilayat faqih influenced puppets before Iran make Yaman another Syria & Iraq.
All Muslims are brothers. I am telling you guys again and again. This houthi government would have been an opposition to the 12er Shia sect itself.

Well the asad clan is not 12ers and look what happen. Saddam was the only "Sunni" leader that was almost as cruel to his people as Bashar, but I dont think he could kill 100K of his own people in just 2-3yrs. He was cruel to Shia & Sunni.

In short, there is no way i would take any chance of another regime bankrolled by Iran. Syria & Iraq are more than enough example. Even more that it will directly affect my close relatives.

You dont know how people there feel. The only people supporting Houti are former regime supporters & houti clan. Majority yemenese dont and i can tell you 99,9% southern yemenese dont.


Bashar Al Assad didn't and isn't killing his own people. How long has he been in power??? If he wanted to kill his own people then he would have started doing this long ago. He was and is dealing with Saudi funded terrorists backed by America and its allies. It's all about regime change and that is what the game plan was right from the beginning. There are plenty of regimes, parties and groups bankrolled by the Saudis and Gulf states but one peaceful Shia dominant country and government seems to fright everyone. Why????
« Last Edit: March 29, 2015, 08:12:36 PM by Ameen »

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #45 on: March 29, 2015, 08:16:32 PM »
Well the first suicide bombers were shiite, so I'm not surprized.

Wrong again! It's the anti Shia fever that doesn't let some of you think straight.

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #46 on: March 29, 2015, 08:21:31 PM »
Arab summit proposes the establishment of a unified Arab force, that all Arab armies participate in, and intervene to support the interests of any Arab country upon its request if its security is threatened.

This decision if it passes will strengthen the Arab nations, of course Iran does not want this, this is why the only Arab country that objected to this proposal was Iraq (Iran's puppet).

Wrong again. Iran wants a united Muslim alliance and wants the Arabs to understand and realise what America and its allies are up to and want. But the Saudis and other Gulf states kiss up to the west as you clearly know. The present Iraq government is made up by the Iraqis under the influence of the west. Iran has got nothing to do with this or anything else. It's you being an anti Shia to such and extreme length that it's not making you think straight.

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #47 on: March 29, 2015, 08:25:39 PM »
Hasan Nasrallat the liar of Hezbullat made a speech today about Yemen saying that Yemenis were peaceful why on earth would they (Saudi) wage war on them!? Then he said that the excuse of Saudi was that Iran was spreading its influence there.

Notice he says "excuse", I don't know which universe is Nasrallat living in, Iranians are quite open about their influence in Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen and Syria.

Then Nasrallat says that he is willing to SWEAR BY ALLAH, that Hezbullat does not receive any orders from Iran. I'm happy he never Swore because he's a liar and he knows it.

Then the liar Nasrallat says, this war on Yemen is a war against Arabs and Muslims, it is not a war against non-Muslim foreigners, thus anyone who is pleased with it, it is as if he participated sinned in front of Allah. I say to this scum, what about your war in Syria!? Not only are you pleased with it but you're an active participant, are those people you fight not Muslims and Arabs!? 13 million Syrian immigrants inside and outside Syria, 300,000 deaths, the destruction of Arab cities to keep one pro-Iranian `Alawite in power is not sinful!?

Then he accuses prince Bandar of creating and funding and training ISIS, SubhanAllah, this Bandar is like the Ibn Saba' of the Shia, everything happening in the Arab world is blamed on prince Bandar and prince Turki, what is he some divine being!? Hezbullat's media has been throwing the name Bandar for as long as I can even remember, years and years of blaming everything in the middle east on Bandar, what a bunch of liars and thugs. Although the Iraqi president was the one who blamed Terrorist attacks in Iraq on Syria! al-Maliki said his government presented sufficient evidence that it was Syria who sent them and trained them! Of course now they're allies under Iran's dominion. Then the Iranians themselves criticized that same Iraqi president accusing him of being too sectarian which caused the creation of groups like ISIS. Rafsangani himself blamed the Shia rituals of celebrating `Umar's death, and cursing the Sahabah is what led to the formation of groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda.

So ponder on these contradictions by the scum servant of Iran.

Like I said that it is your extreme anti Shia fever that is not making you think and see straight. These are just accusations without any reality and facts. People are liars, why??? Because you say and believe. Pull the other one!

Hani

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #48 on: March 29, 2015, 10:21:26 PM »
Wrong again. Iran wants a united Muslim alliance and wants the Arabs to understand and realise what America and its allies are up to and want. But the Saudis and other Gulf states kiss up to the west as you clearly know. The present Iraq government is made up by the Iraqis under the influence of the west. Iran has got nothing to do with this or anything else. It's you being an anti Shia to such and extreme length that it's not making you think straight.


Iraqi government = IRAN. Only an uneducated man would think otherwise, then again you're a brainwashed Iranian tool.

"Maliki spent 24 years in exile, most of them in Tehran and Damascus, and his party was funded by Iran for most of its existence. And in fact, Maliki’s government has followed policies that have been pro-Iranian and pro-Syrian."

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fareed-zakaria-who-lost-iraq-the-iraqis-did-with-an-assist-from-george-w-bush/2014/06/12/35c5a418-f25c-11e3-914c-1fbd0614e2d4_story.html

And say Hi to the Americans for me






Quote
Like I said that it is your extreme anti Shia fever that is not making you think and see straight. These are just accusations without any reality and facts. People are liars, why??? Because you say and believe. Pull the other one!


Well he's obviously a liar if he says Iran doesn't give Hezbullat orders, I think you're the only person on the face of this planet who believes such an obvious lie.


Heck just a few days ago the vice-secretary general of Hezbullat Shaykh Na`eem Qassim said that:


والولي الفقيه يرسم السياسات العامة للأمة في جوانبها المختلفة


"The Wali al-Faqih (Khaminai) is the one who plans the general direction that the nation takes."


المقاومة الإسلامية انتصرت وحمت لبنان وأشعلت روح الجهاد في فلسطين تحت إمرة الولي الفقيه


"The islamic-resistance was victorious and protected Lebanon and lit the fire of resistance in Palestine under the ORDERS of the Wali al-Faqih."


Source is Hezbullat's official tv station al-Manar: http://www.almanar.com.lb/wap/edetails.php?eid=1149586


Heck there's speeches for Nasrallat himself where he admits to be following Iranian orders.


That's why I'm saying, only a brainwashed Shiite would buy what this scum is selling.

« Last Edit: March 29, 2015, 10:27:37 PM by Hani »
عَلامَةُ أَهْلِ الْبِدَعِ الْوَقِيعَةُ فِي أَهْلِ الأَثَرِ. وَعَلامَةُ الْجَهْمِيَّةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ مُشَبِّهَةً. وَعَلامَةُ الْقَدَرِيَّةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ مُجَبِّرَةً. وَعَلامَةُ الزَّنَادِقَةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ الأَثَرِ حَشْوِيَّةً

Religion = simple & clear

Hani

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #49 on: March 29, 2015, 10:31:23 PM »

Bashar Al Assad didn't and isn't killing his own people. How long has he been in power??? If he wanted to kill his own people then he would have started doing this long ago. He was and is dealing with Saudi funded terrorists backed by America and its allies. It's all about regime change and that is what the game plan was right from the beginning. There are plenty of regimes, parties and groups bankrolled by the Saudis and Gulf states but one peaceful Shia dominant country and government seems to fright everyone. Why????

What a dumb argument, he only started massacring them AFTER they rebelled against him and his regime. Everyone admits that the revolution started peacefully but they were crushed by the iron security fist of the regime, loads of them were arrested and tortured, heck Syria used to occupy my country and if anyone used to criticize them openly he'd disappear the next day, imagine what's like in Syria itself then.
عَلامَةُ أَهْلِ الْبِدَعِ الْوَقِيعَةُ فِي أَهْلِ الأَثَرِ. وَعَلامَةُ الْجَهْمِيَّةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ مُشَبِّهَةً. وَعَلامَةُ الْقَدَرِيَّةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ مُجَبِّرَةً. وَعَلامَةُ الزَّنَادِقَةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ الأَثَرِ حَشْوِيَّةً

Religion = simple & clear

Mussana

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #50 on: March 30, 2015, 08:47:55 AM »
Can someone post captions on this vedio.This is in regards to nasrulat speech
[ Invalid YouTube link ]

Husayn

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #51 on: March 30, 2015, 08:53:01 AM »
lol

Summary of one of the points in the video:

Nasrullah: If this was a war against israel, we would be glad to be in this army! But a war against Arabs, Muslims? You will be judged for this on the day of judgement!

Guy responds: So the war on Syria isn't a war on Arabs and Muslims? Oh, wait, is all of Syria da'esh now? So, if all of Syria is Daesh, what the hell has the Syrian government been doing for the last 40 years?
إن يتبعون إلا الظن وما تهوى الأنفس

Furkan

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #52 on: March 30, 2015, 12:37:41 PM »
^LOL, he got faced with that argument live on tv??

What was his response after that?
Before Qazî Mihemed, President of the first kurdish Republic Mahabad was hanged the iranian judge asked:

“last words?”

Qazî: “I thank Allah: even in death he put my shoes above your heads”

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #53 on: March 30, 2015, 01:49:06 PM »

Bashar Al Assad didn't and isn't killing his own people. How long has he been in power??? If he wanted to kill his own people then he would have started doing this long ago. He was and is dealing with Saudi funded terrorists backed by America and its allies. It's all about regime change and that is what the game plan was right from the beginning. There are plenty of regimes, parties and groups bankrolled by the Saudis and Gulf states but one peaceful Shia dominant country and government seems to fright everyone. Why????

What a dumb argument, he only started massacring them AFTER they rebelled against him and his regime. Everyone admits that the revolution started peacefully but they were crushed by the iron security fist of the regime, loads of them were arrested and tortured, heck Syria used to occupy my country and if anyone used to criticize them openly he'd disappear the next day, imagine what's like in Syria itself then.

Revolution started peacefully in all countries and not just Syria. It started in Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Jordan, Bahrain etc you name it. But those regimes that the west are friendly with and consider them their allies, this is where the west didn't get involved. But those countries where the west didn't get along with their governments and considered them a threat to western allies and interests with in the region, this is where the west got involved and tried to over throw the regime.

When it comes to countries like Egypt, Bahrain, Jordan, Yemen etc why didn't the west get involved here??? Why didn't the west come running in the name of democracy, freedom of speech and human rights in to these countries??? Because he west has a strong link with these countries and the regimes are allies of the west. Here the west is doing business with them, getting as much oil as they need and the western interests are safe.

But when it came to Libya and Syria it was a different story. Here democracy, human rights and freedom of speech for the people was used to over throw the regime. And terror groups were given the clearance, backed by Saudi and Gulf states and supported by the west, to move in and benefit from the situation, just to over throw the government. Here the Arab spring was used, by Arab league and the west, to their advantage. Where as people were crushed in Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, Yemen and even in Saudi Arabia peopled started to rise but the governments arrested and tortured people and there was a complete crack down. And here the west stood and watched. Basically they turned a blind eye.

The west only looks after its interest in the East and Asia, especially Middle East and South Asia. Those governments that are considered allies of the west and where western interest is gained and safe, it doesn't matter how they treat their people. And here democracy, human rights and freedom of speech is completely ignored and a blind eye is turned.

But those governments who are not allies of the west and who speak and criticise the west openly because this is according to democracy, human rights and freedom of speech, here the west moves in to topple those governments in the name of democracy human rights and freedom of speech. Here the west shows how wicked these governments are towards their own people.

Saddam was wicked and cruel to his own people but governed for nearly three decades. The west and the Arab league supported and backed him instead of taking any action. Why??? Because he was their ally and looked after their interest. As soon as he developed differences with them and they started to see Saddam as a threat, they turned on Saddam first to reduce his arsenal and then eventually got rid of him with the W.M.D excuse.

My friends, my dear brothers open you eyes before it is too late. The Houthis are no Shias and Iran has no influence over the region. It's the West which has influence over the entire region and only wants to look after its interests through the Arab League.


Mythbuster1

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #54 on: March 30, 2015, 01:51:34 PM »
To the likes of AMEEN who has shia goggles SUPERGLUED on his face, I mean even if you hit this guy with a bat (Sunni bat), it just makes him more crazy

I mean look at this crazy guy he says the first suicide bomber (and that too iranian kid!!! ) is just anti shia prophanda????

lol

The origins of modern Istishhadi attacks lie among the Shia in Iran during the Iran–Iraq War of 1980–1988. Mohammed Hossein Fahmideh, a 13-year-old boy who fought in the war, is said to be the first Muslim to have participated in such an attack in contemporary history. He strapped rocket-propelled grenades to his chest and blew himself up under an Iraqi tank in November 1980. Ayatollah Khomeini declared Fahmideh a national hero and inspiration for further volunteers for martyrdom.[3][4] Other Iranian basij volunteers ran through minefields to detonate buried landmines and clear a safe battlefield path for following soldiers.

So it was the Irani shiites who came up with modern suicide bombings and adding their own version of Islam to it


IRAN loves suicide bombers but they just switch the TAQIYA button on when they confront a Sunni lol

Further justifications have been given by Iranian cleric Ayatollah Mohammad Taghi Mesbah Yazdi, "when protecting Islam and the Muslim community depends on martyrdom operations, it not only is allowed, but even is an obligation as many of the Shi'ah great scholars and Maraje', including Ayatullah Safi Golpayegani and Ayatullah Fazel Lankarani, have clearly announced in their fatwas".[20] Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran showered those who performed martyrdom operations during the Iran–Iraq War and against Israel with accolades. Indeed, Sayyed Abbas al-Musawi, the second Secretary General of Hezbollah and student of Khomeini, created a supplication that became popular among the Hezbollah youths and fighters.[21]


Wow so shiites give GIFTS to suicide bombers??

ASTAGHFIRULLAH

what a USELESS a sect!!!


Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #55 on: March 30, 2015, 01:54:24 PM »
lol

Summary of one of the points in the video:

Nasrullah: If this was a war against israel, we would be glad to be in this army! But a war against Arabs, Muslims? You will be judged for this on the day of judgement!

Guy responds: So the war on Syria isn't a war on Arabs and Muslims? Oh, wait, is all of Syria da'esh now? So, if all of Syria is Daesh, what the hell has the Syrian government been doing for the last 40 years?

The war in Syria is about over throwing the Syrian regime at all costs. And terror groups have been given the clearance to do this backed by the Arab league and strongly supported by the west. Why??? Because Syria is seen as a clear threat to Israel and western influence and interests, when it comes to dominance and power. Iran is also viewed this way.

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #56 on: March 30, 2015, 01:57:50 PM »
To the likes of AMEEN who has shia goggles SUPERGLUED on his face, I mean even if you hit this guy with a bat (Sunni bat), it just makes him more crazy

I mean look at this crazy guy he says the first suicide bomber (and that too iranian kid!!! ) is just anti shia prophanda????

lol

The origins of modern Istishhadi attacks lie among the Shia in Iran during the Iran–Iraq War of 1980–1988. Mohammed Hossein Fahmideh, a 13-year-old boy who fought in the war, is said to be the first Muslim to have participated in such an attack in contemporary history. He strapped rocket-propelled grenades to his chest and blew himself up under an Iraqi tank in November 1980. Ayatollah Khomeini declared Fahmideh a national hero and inspiration for further volunteers for martyrdom.[3][4] Other Iranian basij volunteers ran through minefields to detonate buried landmines and clear a safe battlefield path for following soldiers.

So it was the Irani shiites who came up with modern suicide bombings and adding their own version of Islam to it


IRAN loves suicide bombers but they just switch the TAQIYA button on when they confront a Sunni lol

Further justifications have been given by Iranian cleric Ayatollah Mohammad Taghi Mesbah Yazdi, "when protecting Islam and the Muslim community depends on martyrdom operations, it not only is allowed, but even is an obligation as many of the Shi'ah great scholars and Maraje', including Ayatullah Safi Golpayegani and Ayatullah Fazel Lankarani, have clearly announced in their fatwas".[20] Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran showered those who performed martyrdom operations during the Iran–Iraq War and against Israel with accolades. Indeed, Sayyed Abbas al-Musawi, the second Secretary General of Hezbollah and student of Khomeini, created a supplication that became popular among the Hezbollah youths and fighters.[21]


Wow so shiites give GIFTS to suicide bombers??

ASTAGHFIRULLAH

what a USELESS a sect!!!



That's ok mate. You can hit me with anything. I've read your post and you haven't commented on anything that I have said. Why??? Because you know what I have said is true. It's your ideology and people like you who the west use to serve their desire and protect their interest.

Hani

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #57 on: March 30, 2015, 03:22:45 PM »
Dude Ameen what the heck are you talking about, I'm telling you Syrian protests started peacefully and the armd movements came in a long time after the protests began as a reaction to the regime's policies and you talk about the "west", DUDE we're talking about Syria and how it dealt with protesters, why'd you have to shove the "west" into everything!? Did the west tell Bashar to butcher his people?
عَلامَةُ أَهْلِ الْبِدَعِ الْوَقِيعَةُ فِي أَهْلِ الأَثَرِ. وَعَلامَةُ الْجَهْمِيَّةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ مُشَبِّهَةً. وَعَلامَةُ الْقَدَرِيَّةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ مُجَبِّرَةً. وَعَلامَةُ الزَّنَادِقَةِ أَنْ يُسَمُّوا أَهْلَ الأَثَرِ حَشْوِيَّةً

Religion = simple & clear

Ameen

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #58 on: April 03, 2015, 02:42:22 PM »
How long has Assad been in power??? What, he started to butcher his people now??? Why not early on or before??? Butchering your own people puts you in a bad position and this is a risk that Assad wouldn't take when you are at odds with the west and its allies.

If you are a friend and ally to the west then you can butcher your own people and the west will turn a blind eye like the governments of Bahrain, Yemen before over thrown and Saddam when he was a puppet of the west.

Mythbuster1

Re: Saudia Arabia stands against Shi'ite rebels
« Reply #59 on: April 03, 2015, 03:50:53 PM »
I don't get AMEEN, this guy and his twelver counterparts have been for centuries crying foul over one of the great SAHABA Hazrath muawiya ra, that he gave power to his son........but when hafiz alassad the butcher did the same, gave power to his son (who is another butcher), you are defending him???

Typical SHIITE

Anyway that same west thought of ASSAD as a.....REFORMER!!!



"Initially seen by the domestic and international community as a potential reformer,[9] this expectation ceased when Assad ordered mass crackdowns and military sieges on Arab Spring protesters, leading to the Syrian Civil War. The Syrian opposition, the United States, Canada, the European Union and the majority of the Arab League have called for al-Assad's resignation from the presidency."

and let's not get started on IRAN (IRAN contra), where your SUPREME LEADER aya dollar exchanged weapons from USA, or iraqi SHIITE government (When kafirs landed in Baghdad.....the shiites came out in jubilation) or militias (again supplied by the west) or if your Hizbullah you can make money from drugs!!! Lol (again that profit comes from the west!!) any mukhabarat (secret syrian police) cops or any other Shiite sectarian groups......WHO WERE ONCE SUPPLIED BY THE.......WAIT FOR IT.......WEST, yes that same west who supports Bahrain etc

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
3 Replies
1779 Views
Last post April 08, 2016, 03:18:21 PM
by Abu Jasim Al-Salafi
20 Replies
3763 Views
Last post January 13, 2020, 08:48:44 PM
by Adil
41 Replies
2781 Views
Last post June 15, 2018, 02:34:54 PM
by Noor-us-Sunnah
0 Replies
333 Views
Last post February 01, 2019, 04:56:14 AM
by Qamar Farooq