Lol. You're going to base policy on revenge? Syria and Turkey had already deaded their beef when Bashar Al-Assad came to power. But if you want to take it way back, let's take it way back! Hafez Al-Assad and Syria considered Turkey an occupier of Syrian land, as Iskenderun is Syrian territory in their mind. This is why international relations should be based on "the present" not what has already been resolved. Imagine that, you and your friend had beef which was resolved, then your friend randomly brings it back for no reason. Lol.
As long as you admit that there was beef between Syria and Turkey, you have done yourself a disservice. In other words, you confirmed that Turkey and Syria were weary of each other and trust (between them) was an issue. If it was reversed, based on your assessment and claim that Iskenderun was Syrian territory, I am sure Bashar Al-Assad (to claim Iskenderun) would have done to Turkey what Erdogan did to Syria (since there is land claim on both sides).
However, the name Iskenderun does not sound Arabic at all. Upon little research, I found out that it was a city founded by Alexander the Great (hence the name Iskenderun) originally as "Alexandria" and it was the key to the "Syrian Gates". In other words, it was their gateway to Syria.
Furthermore, Syria gained its independence and became a nation in 1945 whereas the Ottomans had control of Iskenderun way before that. In fact, the Ottoman Empire conquered Syria in 1516 so your red-herring hasn't done much to support your argument.
I would like you to link me to that documentary and the minute/second where it is said Iran helped the US in Afghanistan or Iraq.
What will you ask for next? Do your laundry for you too? I already gave you the Pew Research; about time you learn to look things up if you wish to sustain a discussion.