Thank you for all the information, brother Farid.
I had to let this squint-eyed know the truth so I posted the following under his video (which is uploaded under his YouTube channel):
All the narrations which link Talha ibn Ubaydullah (ra) - the one from the Ten guaranteed Paradise - to this incident are either weak or problematic. They include the narrations which exist in Tafseer Al-Qurtubi, Tabaqat Al-Kabir, Sunan Al-Bayhaqi, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Tafsir Al-Quran. The closest narration is a "mursal" (disconnected) report which says that it was Talha (ra), the one from the Ten Guaranteed Paradise, who expressed interest in marrying Aisha (ra) after the Prophet (saw) passes away. The rest of the reports are outright rejected. Therefore, we do not know for a certainty which one of the Companions (ra) made this remark (regarding marrying Aisha).
If such a thing annoyed the Prophet (saw), and it truly did, imagine how much it annoys Allah (swt) and His Prophet (saw) when Allahyari curses Aisha (ra) and Hafsa (ra). I am glad to see Allahyari expose his own hypocrisy.
Having said that, allow me to go back to the part that Allahyari hides from his viewers. He says that the report comes from Abu Musa who quotes ibn Shaheen. Allahyari says that there are many ibn Shaheen and moves on. If he does not know then I will inform him that this ibn Shaheen was Abu Hafs Umar ibn Shaheen. He is well-known; too bad that Allahyari does not know this or maybe he was hiding this fact because it would have exposed his counter-rebuttal to be nothing but a publicity stunt.
Usudul Ghaba quotes Abu Musa who quotes Abu Hafs ibn Shaheen's book "Al-Sahaba". Abu Musa did not have to give a sanad because he had access to the book of ibn Shaheen (all he did was point to the author as his source). Abu Hafs ibn Shaheen, on the other hand, gives his opinion (that it was a different Talha (ra) who made this remark, not the one from the Ten Guaranteed Paradise). To find out his daleel, or whether or not ibn Shaheen provided proof for his daleel, we must look into his book, Al-Sahaba. And that is what Allahyari should have done but he did not.
Irrespective of whether ibn Shaheen provided a daleel for his opinion or not, and never mind the authenticity of his daleel, it does nothing for Allahyari because he linked Talha (ra) (from the Ten Guaranteed Paradise) to this incident by way of rejected reports. If rejected reports are good enough for Allahyari then the opinion of a trusted scholar (ibn Shaheen) is good enough for us.
Lastly, how is saying such a thing (that I want to marry the wife of the Prophet (saw) after he passes away) a sin before the Qur'an condemned it? Did any of the Companions (ra) say such a thing after the revelation of the verse (in condemnation of it)? No! However, we see Allahyari condemn a companion of the Prophet (saw) for saying such a thing regarding the honor of the Prophet (saw) before the Qur'anic prohibition but he (Allahyari) curses the honor of the Prophet (saw) on a daily basis. The Prophet (saw), in an authentic narration, said, "Don't harm me by harming `Aisha, for by Allah, the Divine Inspiration never came to me while I was under the blanket of any woman amongst you except her".